Sustainability assurance quality and board gender diversity: moderating role of assurance level and provider type on the extent of assurance procedures

Purpose This study aims to investigate the relationship between board gender diversity and the choice of assurance procedures used in sustainability assurance engagements. It also examines whether this relationship is dependent on the type of assurer and if it is particularly strong in reasonable assurance compared to limited assurance engagements. The concept of managerial capture is used to guide the analysis. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a sample of Global Fortune 500 firms. Data on sustainability assurance procedures and related variables were manually collected from sustainability reports, while financial data were obtained from the Refinitiv Eikon database. The study uses ordinary least square estimation model with fixed effects, a difference-in-difference research design and the two-stage Instrumental variable method to analyse the data set. Findings The findings of this study reveal that an increase in board gender diversity is associated with the use of a broader range of sustainability assurance procedures. This relationship is stronger when the assurers are accountants. Moreover, when sustainability assurance requires reasonable assurance, its interaction with board gender diversity results in the use of a broader range of sustainability assurance procedures. Practical implications The findings provide policymakers with a better understanding of the complementary synergies of corporate governance and assurance practitioner attributes that can be exploited for high-quality sustainability assurance engagements. Social implications Aligning board gender diversity with sustainability assurance has the potential to enhance the credibility of sustainability reports and mitigate corporate greenwashing for relevant stakeholders. Originality/value The study uses a direct measurement proxy for assurance procedures that ensure the capturing of the nature and extent of assurance procedures used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-07-2024-0214
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability assurance quality and board gender diversity: moderating role of assurance level and provider type on the extent of assurance procedures

Muhammad Bilal Farooq, Victoria A. Obeng, Seema Miglani, Farzaneh Jalali Aliabadi
6 citations
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
13.36
article

Sustainability assurance quality and board gender diversity: moderating role of assurance level and provider type on the extent of assurance procedures

Muhammad Bilal Farooq, Victoria A. Obeng, Seema Miglani, Farzaneh Jalali Aliabadi
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the relationship between board gender diversity and the choice of assurance procedures used in sustainability assurance engagements. It also examines whether this relationship is dependent on the type of assurer and if it is particularly strong in reasonable assurance compared to limited assurance engagements. The concept of managerial capture is used to guide the analysis. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a sample of Global Fortune 500 firms. Data on sustainability assurance procedures and related variables were manually collected from sustainability reports, while financial data were obtained from the Refinitiv Eikon database. The study uses ordinary least square estimation model with fixed effects, a difference-in-difference research design and the two-stage Instrumental variable method to analyse the data set. Findings The findings of this study reveal that an increase in board gender diversity is associated with the use of a broader range of sustainability assurance procedures. This relationship is stronger when the assurers are accountants. Moreover, when sustainability assurance requires reasonable assurance, its interaction with board gender diversity results in the use of a broader range of sustainability assurance procedures. Practical implications The findings provide policymakers with a better understanding of the complementary synergies of corporate governance and assurance practitioner attributes that can be exploited for high-quality sustainability assurance engagements. Social implications Aligning board gender diversity with sustainability assurance has the potential to enhance the credibility of sustainability reports and mitigate corporate greenwashing for relevant stakeholders. Originality/value The study uses a direct measurement proxy for assurance procedures that ensure the capturing of the nature and extent of assurance procedures used.

Journal of Accounting & Organizational ChangeVol. 21(7)
Al Ain University (AE), La Trobe University (AU), United Arab Emirates University (AE), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
13.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.