Artificial Intelligence vs. Human Cognition: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Candidates Sitting the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma Examination
ChatGPT performed stronger for true/false questions, scoring a pass mark in most instances. Performance was poorer for SBA questions, suggesting that ChatGPT's ability in information retrieval is better than that in knowledge integration. ChatGPT could become a valuable tool in ophthalmic education, allowing exam boards to test their exam papers to ensure they are pitched at the right level, marking open-ended questions and providing detailed feedback.
Authors
- Andrzej E. Grzybowski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3724-2391)
- Jakub Klikowski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3825-5514)
- Anna Maino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1758-4789)
- Tristan Bourcier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9427-7008)
- Michał Woźniak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0146-4205)
- Wahid Ghaffari
- Brendan Strong
Institutions
- Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL)
- Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (GB)
- Health Research Board (IE)
- Stockport NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- AGH University of Krakow (PL)
- Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Vision
- Published
- 2025-04-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9020031
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.31