Effect of asymmetric flexural reinforcement ratios on punching shear resistance

The impact of varying flexural reinforcement ratios in the orthogonal directions ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) on the punching shear resistance (PSR) of flat slabs was experimentally investigated. Six slabs, measuring 1.5 m × 1.5 m × 0.15 m, were tested, with a constant average reinforcement ratio ([Formula: see text]) of 0.3% and [Formula: see text] ratios ranging from 1.2 to 3.0. The results indicated an insignificant effect on punching resistance for [Formula: see text]≤ 2.5. Increasing [Formula: see text] led to wider, more dispersed cracks and enhanced ductility. Comparisons of various codes (BS 8110-1:1997, ACI 318-19, the first and second generations of Eurocode 2 (EC2-2004 and EC2-2023, respectively) and fib Model Code 2010 (MC2010)) revealed that BS 8110-1:1997 provided conservative predictions except for [Formula: see text]= 3.0, while ACI 318-19 consistently overestimated the punching resistance. MC2010 (level of approximation IV) accounted for the reduction in PSR at higher [Formula: see text] ratios. Tests from the literature with [Formula: see text] up to 4.4 exhibited further strength reduction. Comparisons of EC2-2004 and EC2-2023 showed that EC2-2004 gave conservative estimates, with diminishing accuracy as [Formula: see text] increased, while EC2-2023 accurately predicted the punching resistance for [Formula: see text] ≤ 2.5, but overestimated it for higher ratios. This study highlights the limitations of current codes in addressing reinforcement asymmetry effects, and recommends incorporating a reduction factor in EC2-2023 for [Formula: see text] > 2.5 to account for reduced PSR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.24.00123
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of asymmetric flexural reinforcement ratios on punching shear resistance

Mohammed A. Hamad, Mohammed Tagelsir Mustafa Abdelsalam, Abubakr E. S. Musa, Almotaseembillah Ahmed et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
0.95
article

Effect of asymmetric flexural reinforcement ratios on punching shear resistance

Mohammed A. Hamad, Mohammed Tagelsir Mustafa Abdelsalam, Abubakr E. S. Musa, Almotaseembillah Ahmed, Mohammed Mustafa, Ahmed A. Ahmed, Abdelbagi Ataelfdiel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The impact of varying flexural reinforcement ratios in the orthogonal directions ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) on the punching shear resistance (PSR) of flat slabs was experimentally investigated. Six slabs, measuring 1.5 m × 1.5 m × 0.15 m, were tested, with a constant average reinforcement ratio ([Formula: see text]) of 0.3% and [Formula: see text] ratios ranging from 1.2 to 3.0. The results indicated an insignificant effect on punching resistance for [Formula: see text]≤ 2.5. Increasing [Formula: see text] led to wider, more dispersed cracks and enhanced ductility. Comparisons of various codes (BS 8110-1:1997, ACI 318-19, the first and second generations of Eurocode 2 (EC2-2004 and EC2-2023, respectively) and fib Model Code 2010 (MC2010)) revealed that BS 8110-1:1997 provided conservative predictions except for [Formula: see text]= 3.0, while ACI 318-19 consistently overestimated the punching resistance. MC2010 (level of approximation IV) accounted for the reduction in PSR at higher [Formula: see text] ratios. Tests from the literature with [Formula: see text] up to 4.4 exhibited further strength reduction. Comparisons of EC2-2004 and EC2-2023 showed that EC2-2004 gave conservative estimates, with diminishing accuracy as [Formula: see text] increased, while EC2-2023 accurately predicted the punching resistance for [Formula: see text] ≤ 2.5, but overestimated it for higher ratios. This study highlights the limitations of current codes in addressing reinforcement asymmetry effects, and recommends incorporating a reduction factor in EC2-2023 for [Formula: see text] > 2.5 to account for reduced PSR.

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and BuildingsVol. 178(5)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), University of Khartoum (SD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.