Evaluation Of Basic And Advanced Life Support Knowledge Of Health Workers

Objective: Our aim was to assess the knowledge and skill levels of health workers in our hospital in relation to basic and advanced life support and to see if there was a difference before and after the training. Materials and Methods: The training was administered in the light of the updates in the Universal Basic and Advanced Life Support guidelines, and according to the AHA guidelines, with one day of theory and one day of practice. After the training, evaluation was done with the post-test. The demographic information of the participants, the distribution of tasks and the changes between the pre-test and the post-test according to their professional status were statistically evaluated. Results: We look at the training in both basic life support and advanced life support the level of knowledge of the participants increased. Conclusion: When we evaluate the changes in the knowledge levels of the participants after the course, we can say that the level of knowledge and awareness was limited before the training. We think that trainings should be repeated at certain intervals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1548789
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Of Basic And Advanced Life Support Knowledge Of Health Workers

Muhammet Çakas, Ramazan Kıyak, Süha Seri̇n, Bahadır Çağlar et al.
1 citations
Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
2.25
article

Evaluation Of Basic And Advanced Life Support Knowledge Of Health Workers

Muhammet Çakas, Ramazan Kıyak, Süha Seri̇n, Bahadır Çağlar, Meliha Fındık, Ahmet Buğra Önler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to assess the knowledge and skill levels of health workers in our hospital in relation to basic and advanced life support and to see if there was a difference before and after the training. Materials and Methods: The training was administered in the light of the updates in the Universal Basic and Advanced Life Support guidelines, and according to the AHA guidelines, with one day of theory and one day of practice. After the training, evaluation was done with the post-test. The demographic information of the participants, the distribution of tasks and the changes between the pre-test and the post-test according to their professional status were statistically evaluated. Results: We look at the training in both basic life support and advanced life support the level of knowledge of the participants increased. Conclusion: When we evaluate the changes in the knowledge levels of the participants after the course, we can say that the level of knowledge and awareness was limited before the training. We think that trainings should be repeated at certain intervals.

Balıkesır Health Sciences JournalVol. 14(1)
Balıkesir University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
2.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.