The Bright Side of Foreign Competition: Import Penetration and Default Risk

We examine the effect that foreign competition has on firms’ default risk and document a strong and robust negative association. Utilizing a large sample of public U.S. manufacturing firms and industry-level import penetration data, we find that an increase in import penetration from the 25th to the 75th percentile leads to a reduction in corporate default risk of roughly 3%. These results hold after accounting for potential endogeneity concerns. Additional tests reveal that the reduction in default risk is attributable to import penetration reducing idiosyncratic decision making within firms, as well as inducing safer yet more myopic investments. Our results contrast with those of Platt (2020), who shows that the competitive environment increases the cost of debt. We argue that model selection is crucial in studies on the causal effects of competition, with more restrictive models to be preferred due to significant endogeneity concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Finance Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/104.00000158
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Bright Side of Foreign Competition: Import Penetration and Default Risk

Ghasan Baghdadi, Nader Atawnah, Edward Podolski, Huu Nhan Duong
1 citations
Critical Finance Review
Global trade and economics
3.09
article

The Bright Side of Foreign Competition: Import Penetration and Default Risk

Ghasan Baghdadi, Nader Atawnah, Edward Podolski, Huu Nhan Duong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We examine the effect that foreign competition has on firms’ default risk and document a strong and robust negative association. Utilizing a large sample of public U.S. manufacturing firms and industry-level import penetration data, we find that an increase in import penetration from the 25th to the 75th percentile leads to a reduction in corporate default risk of roughly 3%. These results hold after accounting for potential endogeneity concerns. Additional tests reveal that the reduction in default risk is attributable to import penetration reducing idiosyncratic decision making within firms, as well as inducing safer yet more myopic investments. Our results contrast with those of Platt (2020), who shows that the competitive environment increases the cost of debt. We argue that model selection is crucial in studies on the causal effects of competition, with more restrictive models to be preferred due to significant endogeneity concerns.

Critical Finance ReviewVol. 14(2)
La Trobe University (AU), United Arab Emirates University (AE), Monash University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Global trade and economics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Bright Side of Foreign Competition: Import Penetration and Default Risk — Ghasan Baghdadi, Nader Atawnah, et al. · Critical Finance Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS