The size and shape of sound: The role of articulation and acoustics in iconicity and crossmodal correspondences

Onomatopoeias like hiss and peep are iconic because their forms resemble their meanings. Iconicity can also involve forms and meanings in different modalities, such as when people match the nonce words bouba and kiki to round and angular objects, and mil and mal to small and large ones, also known as "sound symbolism." This paper focuses on what specific analogies motivate such correspondences in spoken language: do people associate shapes and size with how phonemes sound (auditory), or how they are produced (articulatory)? Based on a synthesis of empirical evidence probing the cognitive mechanisms underlying different types of sound symbolism, this paper argues that analogies based on acoustics alone are often sufficient, rendering extant articulatory explanations for many iconic phenomena superfluous. This paper further suggests that different types of crossmodal iconicity in spoken language can fruitfully be understood as an extension of onomatopoeia: when speakers iconically depict such perceptual characteristics as size and shape, they mimic the acoustics that are correlated with these characteristics in the natural world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036362
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The size and shape of sound: The role of articulation and acoustics in iconicity and crossmodal correspondences

Bodo Winter
3 citations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Multisensory perception and integration
6.35
article

The size and shape of sound: The role of articulation and acoustics in iconicity and crossmodal correspondences

Bodo Winter
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Onomatopoeias like hiss and peep are iconic because their forms resemble their meanings. Iconicity can also involve forms and meanings in different modalities, such as when people match the nonce words bouba and kiki to round and angular objects, and mil and mal to small and large ones, also known as "sound symbolism." This paper focuses on what specific analogies motivate such correspondences in spoken language: do people associate shapes and size with how phonemes sound (auditory), or how they are produced (articulatory)? Based on a synthesis of empirical evidence probing the cognitive mechanisms underlying different types of sound symbolism, this paper argues that analogies based on acoustics alone are often sufficient, rendering extant articulatory explanations for many iconic phenomena superfluous. This paper further suggests that different types of crossmodal iconicity in spoken language can fruitfully be understood as an extension of onomatopoeia: when speakers iconically depict such perceptual characteristics as size and shape, they mimic the acoustics that are correlated with these characteristics in the natural world.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4)
University of Birmingham (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Multisensory perception and integration
6.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.