Diagnostic Accuracy of the Siriraj Portable Digital Cervicography Device Versus Standard Colposcopy for Detecting CIN2 <sup>+</sup> Lesions

To improve access to colposcopy for women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results, this study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the internally developed Siriraj portable digital cervicography device for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2<sup>+</sup>) and compared its performance with standard colposcopy. Consenting eligible women underwent examination using both the Siriraj portable digital cervicography device and standard colposcopy. Images from each method were independently evaluated by a physician blinded to the other images and histology results. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of both methods for detecting CIN2<sup>+</sup>. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using Cochran's Q test, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. A total of 450 women participated, with histologically confirmed CIN2<sup>+</sup> in 91 cases (20.1%), including 45 women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3<sup>+</sup>). Incorporating colposcopic impressions, the modified Reid's colposcopic index, and the modified Swede score, the Siriraj portable digital cervicography device demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 81.3% for CIN2<sup>+</sup>, whereas standard colposcopy ranged from 79.1% to 81.6%. No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy was found among the six evaluative methods (p = 0.558). The Siriraj portable digital cervicography device shows promise as an alternative to standard colposcopy for detecting CIN2<sup>+</sup>, particularly in low-resource settings. While it enables remote evaluation by trained colposcopists, its diagnostic performance remains dependent on expert image interpretation. Standardizing biopsy protocols and integrating AI-assisted analysis could further enhance its clinical utility. Trial Registration: TCTR20230907004; registered on September 7, 2023; https://thaiclinicaltrials.org.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Virology
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.70339
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Siriraj Portable Digital Cervicography Device Versus Standard Colposcopy for Detecting CIN2 + Lesions

Nida Jareemit, Pornprom Ittiamornlert, Suchanan Hanamornroongruang, Pattama Chaopotong et al.
1 citations
Journal of Medical Virology
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
1.35
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Siriraj Portable Digital Cervicography Device Versus Standard Colposcopy for Detecting CIN2 + Lesions

Nida Jareemit, Pornprom Ittiamornlert, Suchanan Hanamornroongruang, Pattama Chaopotong, Irene Ruengkhachorn, Wathirada Karnchanabanyong, Sompop Kuljarusnont, Methawee Ularnwong, Sirakarn Rochwipaporn, Vilaiwan Surapo, Sarocha Boonkate
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To improve access to colposcopy for women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results, this study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the internally developed Siriraj portable digital cervicography device for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2<sup>+</sup>) and compared its performance with standard colposcopy. Consenting eligible women underwent examination using both the Siriraj portable digital cervicography device and standard colposcopy. Images from each method were independently evaluated by a physician blinded to the other images and histology results. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of both methods for detecting CIN2<sup>+</sup>. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using Cochran's Q test, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. A total of 450 women participated, with histologically confirmed CIN2<sup>+</sup> in 91 cases (20.1%), including 45 women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3<sup>+</sup>). Incorporating colposcopic impressions, the modified Reid's colposcopic index, and the modified Swede score, the Siriraj portable digital cervicography device demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 81.3% for CIN2<sup>+</sup>, whereas standard colposcopy ranged from 79.1% to 81.6%. No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy was found among the six evaluative methods (p = 0.558). The Siriraj portable digital cervicography device shows promise as an alternative to standard colposcopy for detecting CIN2<sup>+</sup>, particularly in low-resource settings. While it enables remote evaluation by trained colposcopists, its diagnostic performance remains dependent on expert image interpretation. Standardizing biopsy protocols and integrating AI-assisted analysis could further enhance its clinical utility. Trial Registration: TCTR20230907004; registered on September 7, 2023; https://thaiclinicaltrials.org.

Journal of Medical VirologyVol. 97(4)
Siriraj Hospital (TH), Mahidol University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.