DESI 2024 III: baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars

Abstract We present the DESI 2024 galaxy and quasar baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) measurements using over 5.7 million unique galaxy and quasar redshifts in the range 0.1 < z < 2.1. Divided by tracer type, we utilize 300,017 galaxies from the magnitude-limited Bright Galaxy Survey with 0.1 < z < 0.4, 2,138,600 Luminous Red Galaxies with 0.4 < z < 1.1, 2,432,022 Emission Line Galaxies with 0.8 < z < 1.6, and 856,652 quasars with 0.8 < z < 2.1, over a ∼ 7,500 square degree footprint. The analysis was blinded at the catalog-level to avoid confirmation bias. All fiducial choices of the BAO fitting and reconstruction methodology, as well as the size of the systematic errors, were determined on the basis of the tests with mock catalogs and the blinded data catalogs. We present several improvements to the BAO analysis pipeline, including enhancing the BAO fitting and reconstruction methods in a more physically-motivated direction, and also present results using combinations of tracers. We employ a unified BAO analysis method across all tracers. We present a re-analysis of SDSS BOSS and eBOSS results applying the improved DESI methodology and find scatter consistent with the level of the quoted SDSS theoretical systematic uncertainties. With the total effective survey volume of ∼ 18 Gpc 3 , the combined precision of the BAO measurements across the six different redshift bins is ∼0.52%, marking a 1.2-fold improvement over the previous state-of-the-art results using only first-year data. We detect the BAO in all of these six redshift bins. The highest significance of BAO detection is 9.1σ at the effective redshift of 0.93, with a constraint of 0.86% placed on the BAO scale. We find that our observed BAO scales are systematically larger than the prediction of the Planck 2018-ΛCDM at z < 0.8. We translate the results into transverse comoving distance and radial Hubble distance measurements, which are used to constrain cosmological models in our companion paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/012
Citations
207
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
239.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DESI 2024 III: baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars

D. Kirkby, C. Ravoux, H. E. Noriega, Will J. Percival et al.
207 citations
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
239.04
article

DESI 2024 III: baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars

D. Kirkby, C. Ravoux, H. E. Noriega, Will J. Percival, Ting-Wen Lan, Vid Iršič, Dustin Lang, Daniel Margala, C. García-Quintero, Abhijeet Anand, Rongpu Zhou, Paul Martini, D. Rabinowitz, Michael Walther, A. G. Smith, E. Chaussidon, A. Muñoz-Gutiérrez, N. Findlay, Humna Awan, E.A. Zaborowski, Anand Raichoor, Mathilde Pinon, Ting S. Li, N. Deiosso, Alma X. González‐Morales, Matthew M. Pieri, Ann Elliott, S. Trusov, Alejandro Avilés, Ruiyang Zhao, Eva-Maria Mueller, S. Kent, Florian Beutler, N. Palanque‐Delabrouille, S. Nadathur, H. K. Herrera-Alcantar, Violeta González-Pérez, Santiago Avila, Jeffrey A. Newman, J. Ereza, Gregory Tarlé, Kyle Dawson, L. Napolitano, Constance M. Rockosi, Andreu Font-Ribera, Shi-Fan Chen, E. Armengaud, Jorge L. Cervantes–Cota, A. G. Adame, Robert Blum, F. Valdés, D. Green, A. Porredon, Laurent Le Guillou, Christophe Yèche, Licia Verde, M. Maus, Gustavo Niz, D. Bianchi, D. Valcin, Ben Wang, David J. Schlegel, Ignasi Pérez-Ràfols, Axel de la Macorra, S. Bailey, Parker Fagrelius, Héctor Gil-Marín, A. Bault, Martin Landriau, Alex Krolewski, O. Alves, Marcelo A. Alvarez, Simone Ferraro, Lado Samushia, Jundan Nie, A. Brodzeller, Shaun Cole, M. E. Levi, S. Brieden, Nhat-Minh Nguyen, Rossana Ruggeri, J. Moon, N. Weaverdyck, C. Baltay, Marc Manera, Sihan Yuan, G. Gutierrez, J. Lasker, Naim Göksel Karaçaylı, J. Aguilar, Nikhil Padmanabhan, Anthony Kremin, J. Guy, D. Gruen, David H. Weinberg, Eusebio Sanchez, Satya Gontcho A Gontcho, Shadab Alam, J. Mena-Fernández, Ashley J. Ross, S. BenZvi, Alexie Leauthaud, A. Carnero Rosell, ChangHoon Hahn, Cheng Zhao, Christoph Saulder, Edward F. Schlafly, K. Honscheid, Daniel J. Eisenstein, A. de Mattia, Martin White, Andrei Cuceu, A. Slosar, Joseph Harry Silber, Cullan Howlett, J. Chaves-Montero, Michael Wilson, Arjun T. Dey, K. Fanning, R. M. Sharples, A. Rocher, E. Paillas, J. E. Forero-Romero, T. M. Davis, Steven P. Ahlen, Aaron Meisner, Pauline Zarrouk, M. Schubnell, Solène Chabanier, Biprateep Dey, Mehdi Rezaie, D. M. Alexander, B. Flaugher, M. Rashkovetskyi, Dragan Huterer A, Cullen H. Blake, C. Ramírez-Pérez, S. Eftekharzadeh, Risa H. Wechsler, John Moustakas, Rafaela Gsponer, Shannon Moore, Z. Ding, Claire Poppett, Eric V. Linder, D. Forero-Sánchez, U. Andrade, Patrick McDonald, Mustapha Ishak, A. Rosado-Marin, R. Cereskaite, Yu Yu, Xinyi Chen, M. S. Wang, Hanyu Zhang, Hui Kong, Hee‐Jong Seo, Jiaxi Yu, Jiaming Pan, M. Vargas-Magaña, Ying‐Cheng Lai, T. Tan, R. Calderón, S. Ramirez-Solano, J.M. Le Goff, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider, K. Lodha, Hu Zou, J. Swanson, Jayashree Behera, Graziano Rossi, Boryana Hadzhiyska, Richard Neveux, P. Doel, Natalie A. Roe, J. Rich, B. A. Weaver, R. Miquel, E. Gaztañaga, M. Hanif, E. Buckley-Geer, Jerry Edelstein, S. Penmetsa, L. Medina-Varela, R. Vaisakh, T. Claybaugh, C. Magneville, Adam D. Myers, E. Burtin, Donal Brooks, F. Prada, R. E. A. Canning, S. Juneau, R. Kehoe, D. Sprayberry, A. Pérez-Fernández, C. Gordon
article en
207 citations

Abstract

Abstract We present the DESI 2024 galaxy and quasar baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) measurements using over 5.7 million unique galaxy and quasar redshifts in the range 0.1 < z < 2.1. Divided by tracer type, we utilize 300,017 galaxies from the magnitude-limited Bright Galaxy Survey with 0.1 < z < 0.4, 2,138,600 Luminous Red Galaxies with 0.4 < z < 1.1, 2,432,022 Emission Line Galaxies with 0.8 < z < 1.6, and 856,652 quasars with 0.8 < z < 2.1, over a ∼ 7,500 square degree footprint. The analysis was blinded at the catalog-level to avoid confirmation bias. All fiducial choices of the BAO fitting and reconstruction methodology, as well as the size of the systematic errors, were determined on the basis of the tests with mock catalogs and the blinded data catalogs. We present several improvements to the BAO analysis pipeline, including enhancing the BAO fitting and reconstruction methods in a more physically-motivated direction, and also present results using combinations of tracers. We employ a unified BAO analysis method across all tracers. We present a re-analysis of SDSS BOSS and eBOSS results applying the improved DESI methodology and find scatter consistent with the level of the quoted SDSS theoretical systematic uncertainties. With the total effective survey volume of ∼ 18 Gpc 3 , the combined precision of the BAO measurements across the six different redshift bins is ∼0.52%, marking a 1.2-fold improvement over the previous state-of-the-art results using only first-year data. We detect the BAO in all of these six redshift bins. The highest significance of BAO detection is 9.1σ at the effective redshift of 0.93, with a constraint of 0.86% placed on the BAO scale. We find that our observed BAO scales are systematically larger than the prediction of the Planck 2018-ΛCDM at z < 0.8. We translate the results into transverse comoving distance and radial Hubble distance measurements, which are used to constrain cosmological models in our companion paper.

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsVol. 2025(04)
Boston University (US), Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN), Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of Wyoming (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Space Telescope Science Institute (US), Universidad de Guanajuato (MX), Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US), Institute of Space Sciences (ES), Universities Space Research Association (US), University of Arizona (US), Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), University of Waterloo (CA), Universidad de La Laguna (ES), Universidad de Los Andes (CO), The University of Texas at Dallas (US), University of Sussex (GB), The University of Queensland (AU), National Taiwan University (TW), University of Pittsburgh (US), Southern Methodist University (US), Ilia State University (GE), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Perimeter Institute (CA), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), University of Toronto (CA), Institute for High Energy Physics (ES), University of Milan (IT), Kansas State University (US), Durham University (GB), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Brookhaven National Laboratory (US), Princeton University (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), University of Utah (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), University of Michigan (US), Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (CN), Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KR), Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris (FR), SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US), Evgeni Kharadze Georgian National Astrophysical Observatory (GE), Sejong University (KR), Center for Theoretical Physics (PL), Yale University (US), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institute for Advanced Study (US), University of Chicago (US), Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE), Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (ES), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares (MX), Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (US), Excellence Cluster Origins (DE), Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Hautes Énergies (FR), Royal Observatory (GB), Ohio University (US), Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US), Summit School (US), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (ES), Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules (FR), Community Science and Data Center (US), Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados (MX), Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie (FR), Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe (IT), Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (ES), Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (MX), National Astronomical Observatories (CN), Institut de Recherche sur les Lois Fondamentales de l'Univers (FR), Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (ES), University College London (GB), UK Astronomy Technology Centre (GB), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), The Ohio State University (US), University of Rochester (US), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), University of Portsmouth (GB), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Beihang University (CN), Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos (MX), Korea University of Science and Technology (KR), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX), Siena College (US), University of California, Berkeley (US), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES), Stanford University (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
239.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.