Effect of sovereign risk and debt‐side governance on cross‐border infrastructure risk premium in a developing nation: The case of Kenya

Abstract Motivation Developing countries' reliance on foreign capital for large‐scale infrastructure projects makes sovereign risk premium and debt‐side governance practices key determinants of cross‐border infrastructure risk premiums. Purpose This study estimates the effect of international sovereign bond spreads (systematic risk) and debt‐side governance (unsystematic risk) on cross‐border infrastructure risk premiums in Kenya's major infrastructure projects from 2011 to 2020. Approach and methods We use pooled and random‐effects panel data analysis of secondary data. Findings The findings show that rising international sovereign bond spreads (ranging from 9.6% to 32.39%), corruption levels, external debt‐to‐import ratios, loan utilization rates, disbursement delays, and climate risk disclosure significantly contributed to increasing cross‐border infrastructure risk premiums. The interaction between bond spreads and corruption had a compounding effect in increasing cross‐border infrastructure risk premiums. On the other hand, longer loan maturities, higher internal rates of return, substantial government involvement, and a rising external debt to total investment ratio reduce project risk premiums. Policy implications These findings underscore the need for Kenya's modern Public Debt Management Office and infrastructure execution institutions to reduce external borrowing costs through governance reforms that improve transparency, project oversight, and environmental standards. By strengthening debt‐side governance, Kenya can reduce its external borrowing costs and improve the sustainability of infrastructure‐led debt. As such, the study offers actionable insights for low‐ and middle‐income countries, emphasizing the role of modern sovereign debt management tools that target sustainability and strategic governance reforms at the project level in attracting more favourable borrowing rates for infrastructure financing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development Policy Review
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70010
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of sovereign risk and debt‐side governance on cross‐border infrastructure risk premium in a developing nation: The case of Kenya

Salome Oyuga, Geoffrey Ngene, Edward G. Ochieng
1 citations
Development Policy Review
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
2.21
article

Effect of sovereign risk and debt‐side governance on cross‐border infrastructure risk premium in a developing nation: The case of Kenya

Salome Oyuga, Geoffrey Ngene, Edward G. Ochieng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Motivation Developing countries' reliance on foreign capital for large‐scale infrastructure projects makes sovereign risk premium and debt‐side governance practices key determinants of cross‐border infrastructure risk premiums. Purpose This study estimates the effect of international sovereign bond spreads (systematic risk) and debt‐side governance (unsystematic risk) on cross‐border infrastructure risk premiums in Kenya's major infrastructure projects from 2011 to 2020. Approach and methods We use pooled and random‐effects panel data analysis of secondary data. Findings The findings show that rising international sovereign bond spreads (ranging from 9.6% to 32.39%), corruption levels, external debt‐to‐import ratios, loan utilization rates, disbursement delays, and climate risk disclosure significantly contributed to increasing cross‐border infrastructure risk premiums. The interaction between bond spreads and corruption had a compounding effect in increasing cross‐border infrastructure risk premiums. On the other hand, longer loan maturities, higher internal rates of return, substantial government involvement, and a rising external debt to total investment ratio reduce project risk premiums. Policy implications These findings underscore the need for Kenya's modern Public Debt Management Office and infrastructure execution institutions to reduce external borrowing costs through governance reforms that improve transparency, project oversight, and environmental standards. By strengthening debt‐side governance, Kenya can reduce its external borrowing costs and improve the sustainability of infrastructure‐led debt. As such, the study offers actionable insights for low‐ and middle‐income countries, emphasizing the role of modern sovereign debt management tools that target sustainability and strategic governance reforms at the project level in attracting more favourable borrowing rates for infrastructure financing.

Development Policy ReviewVol. 43(3)
Mercer University (US), Strathmore University (KE), British University in Dubai (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.