Investor reactions to climate change disclosures: Joint effects of disclosure focus and controllability

Abstract When evaluating the potential financial effects of climate change, investors demand disclosures of the climate‐related risks and opportunities that companies need to manage. We examine how and why management control over climate change performance affects investors' evaluations of such disclosures. In a series of experiments, we find that investors believe that managerial optimism is beneficial and, thus, are more willing to invest when climate‐related disclosures focus on opportunities rather than risks. This effect, however, occurs only when management has high control over the company's future climate change performance. When that control is low, investors believe that managerial realism is beneficial and, thus, are more willing to invest when these disclosures focus on risks rather than opportunities. Our study has implications for companies and standard setters considering the consequences of focusing on either risks or opportunities in climate change reporting and the conditions under which one focus or the other may be beneficial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Accounting Research
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.13037
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investor reactions to climate change disclosures: Joint effects of disclosure focus and controllability

Dani Puspitasari, Soon‐Yeow Phang, Prabashi Dharmasiri
6 citations
Contemporary Accounting Research
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
13.36
article

Investor reactions to climate change disclosures: Joint effects of disclosure focus and controllability

Dani Puspitasari, Soon‐Yeow Phang, Prabashi Dharmasiri
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract When evaluating the potential financial effects of climate change, investors demand disclosures of the climate‐related risks and opportunities that companies need to manage. We examine how and why management control over climate change performance affects investors' evaluations of such disclosures. In a series of experiments, we find that investors believe that managerial optimism is beneficial and, thus, are more willing to invest when climate‐related disclosures focus on opportunities rather than risks. This effect, however, occurs only when management has high control over the company's future climate change performance. When that control is low, investors believe that managerial realism is beneficial and, thus, are more willing to invest when these disclosures focus on risks rather than opportunities. Our study has implications for companies and standard setters considering the consequences of focusing on either risks or opportunities in climate change reporting and the conditions under which one focus or the other may be beneficial.

Contemporary Accounting ResearchVol. 42(2)
Monash University (AU)
Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, Monash University, RMIT University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
13.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.