Getting our sea back: Indigenous governance and biocultural conservation of coastal and marine commons

The Indigenous management of the commons has been the subject of considerable interest by the scientific community in recent decades. One area of growing interest is the study of how these groups organise and act to confront external development initiatives that threaten their livelihoods and the ecosystems that sustain them. This article examines the challenges and opportunities created by a law in Chile that establishes Indigenous Marine Areas, which allows Indigenous peoples to manage marine and coastal areas to protect their customary uses. Integrating insights from critical geography and political ecology on commons governance, Indigenous resurgence, and local social-ecological well-being, this study aims to advance understanding of how Indigenous peoples respond to the socio-ecological impacts of aquaculture in southern Chile under the new law. The analysis focuses on the changes in the access and use of coastal marine space and resources. The findings illustrate that establishing these Indigenous Marine Areas fosters alternative models of territorial development and marine conservation, thereby contributing to local socio-ecological well-being. Despite the socio-territorial intricacy of these processes and the opposition from global industries such as salmon aquaculture, the study concluded that the law has the potential to significantly broaden the range of actors, knowledge, and practices involved in the governance of coastal and marine commons, thereby promoting equity in access to and management of marine spaces and resources. • Creating Indigenous Marine Areas (IMAs) in Chile enhances coastal and marine governance. • IMAs regulate the expansion of industrial aquaculture. • Indigenous peoples promote local development, marine conservation, and community well-being. • The implementation of IMAs can lead to conflicts between territorial actors. • Informed participation, access agreements, and conflict management are crucial for establishing AIMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Policy
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106705
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Getting our sea back: Indigenous governance and biocultural conservation of coastal and marine commons

Francisco Araos, Antònia Casellas, Daniel Carrasco Bahamonde
4 citations
Marine Policy
Coastal and Marine Management
9.69
article

Getting our sea back: Indigenous governance and biocultural conservation of coastal and marine commons

Francisco Araos, Antònia Casellas, Daniel Carrasco Bahamonde
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The Indigenous management of the commons has been the subject of considerable interest by the scientific community in recent decades. One area of growing interest is the study of how these groups organise and act to confront external development initiatives that threaten their livelihoods and the ecosystems that sustain them. This article examines the challenges and opportunities created by a law in Chile that establishes Indigenous Marine Areas, which allows Indigenous peoples to manage marine and coastal areas to protect their customary uses. Integrating insights from critical geography and political ecology on commons governance, Indigenous resurgence, and local social-ecological well-being, this study aims to advance understanding of how Indigenous peoples respond to the socio-ecological impacts of aquaculture in southern Chile under the new law. The analysis focuses on the changes in the access and use of coastal marine space and resources. The findings illustrate that establishing these Indigenous Marine Areas fosters alternative models of territorial development and marine conservation, thereby contributing to local socio-ecological well-being. Despite the socio-territorial intricacy of these processes and the opposition from global industries such as salmon aquaculture, the study concluded that the law has the potential to significantly broaden the range of actors, knowledge, and practices involved in the governance of coastal and marine commons, thereby promoting equity in access to and management of marine spaces and resources. • Creating Indigenous Marine Areas (IMAs) in Chile enhances coastal and marine governance. • IMAs regulate the expansion of industrial aquaculture. • Indigenous peoples promote local development, marine conservation, and community well-being. • The implementation of IMAs can lead to conflicts between territorial actors. • Informed participation, access agreements, and conflict management are crucial for establishing AIMs.

Marine PolicyVol. 178
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of Chile (CL)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Coastal and Marine Management
9.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.