Bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization

We introduce a method for solving combinatorial optimization problems on digital quantum computers, where we incorporate auxiliary counterdiabatic (CD) terms into the adiabatic Hamiltonian, while integrating bias terms derived from an iterative digitized counterdiabatic quantum algorithm. We call this protocol bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO). Designed to effectively tackle large-scale combinatorial optimization problems, BF-DCQO demonstrates resilience against the limitations posed by the restricted coherence times of current quantum processors and shows clear enhancement even in the presence of noise. Additionally, our purely quantum approach eliminates the dependency on classical optimization required in hybrid classical-quantum schemes, thereby circumventing the trainability issues often associated with variational quantum algorithms. Through the analysis of an all-to-all connected general Ising spin-glass problem, we exhibit a polynomial scaling enhancement in ground-state success probability compared to traditional DCQO and finite-time adiabatic quantum optimization methods. Furthermore, it achieves scaling improvements in ground-state success probabilities, increasing by up to two orders of magnitude, and offers an average <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mrow><a:mn>1.3</a:mn><a:mo>×</a:mo></a:mrow></a:math> better approximation ratio than the quantum approximate optimization algorithm for the problem sizes studied. We validate these findings through experimental implementations on both trapped-ion quantum computers and superconducting processors, tackling a maximum weighted independent set problem with 36 qubits and a spin glass on a heavy-hexagonal lattice with 100 qubits, respectively. These results mark a significant advancement in gate-based quantum computing, employing a fully quantum algorithmic approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Research
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.7.l022010
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization

E. Solano, Narendra N. Hegade, Alejandro Gomez Cadavid, Archismita Dalal et al.
7 citations
Physical Review Research
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
17.37
article

Bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization

E. Solano, Narendra N. Hegade, Alejandro Gomez Cadavid, Archismita Dalal, Anton Simen
article en
7 citations

Abstract

We introduce a method for solving combinatorial optimization problems on digital quantum computers, where we incorporate auxiliary counterdiabatic (CD) terms into the adiabatic Hamiltonian, while integrating bias terms derived from an iterative digitized counterdiabatic quantum algorithm. We call this protocol bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO). Designed to effectively tackle large-scale combinatorial optimization problems, BF-DCQO demonstrates resilience against the limitations posed by the restricted coherence times of current quantum processors and shows clear enhancement even in the presence of noise. Additionally, our purely quantum approach eliminates the dependency on classical optimization required in hybrid classical-quantum schemes, thereby circumventing the trainability issues often associated with variational quantum algorithms. Through the analysis of an all-to-all connected general Ising spin-glass problem, we exhibit a polynomial scaling enhancement in ground-state success probability compared to traditional DCQO and finite-time adiabatic quantum optimization methods. Furthermore, it achieves scaling improvements in ground-state success probabilities, increasing by up to two orders of magnitude, and offers an average <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mrow><a:mn>1.3</a:mn><a:mo>×</a:mo></a:mrow></a:math> better approximation ratio than the quantum approximate optimization algorithm for the problem sizes studied. We validate these findings through experimental implementations on both trapped-ion quantum computers and superconducting processors, tackling a maximum weighted independent set problem with 36 qubits and a spin glass on a heavy-hexagonal lattice with 100 qubits, respectively. These results mark a significant advancement in gate-based quantum computing, employing a fully quantum algorithmic approach.

Physical Review ResearchVol. 7(2)
University of the Basque Country (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
17.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.