Health equity implications of a feminized health care workforce

Scholars of health equity have focused on mitigating disparities rooted in structural disadvantages for the most marginalized sectors of society. Men’s unfavorable health outcomes compared to women have been seen as products of biology, not social determinants, and therefore outside the scope of efforts to address inequities. Since the late twentieth century, however, women across the globe have overcome previous barriers to participation in the healthcare workforce and quickly outnumbered men in most roles. While women’s growing dominance in most health professions is a welcome corrective to their previous exclusion, their success masks a failure of men to adapt to a changing socioeconomic landscape. One possible consequence of the feminization of the health professions will be the increasing difficulty of matching patients and clients with a clinician of the same sex. Evidence for the benefits of sex concordance between health professional and client is incomplete yet compelling. Including men as a group susceptible to health inequities acknowledges that even people with structural advantages can be impacted by social determinants that lead to negative health consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Equity
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/29944694.2025.2487063
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health equity implications of a feminized health care workforce

Peter S. Cahn
Journal of Health Equity
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Health equity implications of a feminized health care workforce

Peter S. Cahn
article en

Abstract

Scholars of health equity have focused on mitigating disparities rooted in structural disadvantages for the most marginalized sectors of society. Men’s unfavorable health outcomes compared to women have been seen as products of biology, not social determinants, and therefore outside the scope of efforts to address inequities. Since the late twentieth century, however, women across the globe have overcome previous barriers to participation in the healthcare workforce and quickly outnumbered men in most roles. While women’s growing dominance in most health professions is a welcome corrective to their previous exclusion, their success masks a failure of men to adapt to a changing socioeconomic landscape. One possible consequence of the feminization of the health professions will be the increasing difficulty of matching patients and clients with a clinician of the same sex. Evidence for the benefits of sex concordance between health professional and client is incomplete yet compelling. Including men as a group susceptible to health inequities acknowledges that even people with structural advantages can be impacted by social determinants that lead to negative health consequences.

Journal of Health EquityVol. 2(1)
MGH Institute of Health Professions (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.