Unraveling the pain points of domain modeling

Conceptual models offer numerous benefits but require significant investments, requiring modelers to strive to balance costs and benefits. Understanding the modeling process and the frustrations experienced by modelers can provide valuable insights for this assessment. While research acknowledges certain instances of modelers’ dissatisfaction, its scope often limits detailed examination. This study seeks to identify and analyze the main pain points associated with domain modeling through a five-phase empirical study using a multi-method approach. We identified 71 pain points, synthesized them to 41 , and prioritized 16 as the most significant and prevalent in domain modeling. We then refined, documented, and exemplified the prioritized pain points, analyzed their potential causes, and discussed their practical implications. Our findings provide valuable insights for improving modelers’ experiences and optimizing the modeling process. • 41 pain points in structural conceptual modeling were mapped. • 16 pain points were identified as the most significant and prevalent. • Pain points may stem from a lack of experience among modelers and stakeholders. • Pain points may arise from issues with modeling methods, tools, and languages. • Pain points may arise from factors related to the organization, domain, and project.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Software Technology
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107736
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling the pain points of domain modeling

Henderik A. Proper, Eduardo Guerra, Maya Daneva, Tiago Prince Sales et al.
1 citations
Information and Software Technology
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
2.31
article

Unraveling the pain points of domain modeling

Henderik A. Proper, Eduardo Guerra, Maya Daneva, Tiago Prince Sales, Giancarlo Guizzardi, Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Santos, Isadora Valle Sousa, Renata S. S. Guizzardi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Conceptual models offer numerous benefits but require significant investments, requiring modelers to strive to balance costs and benefits. Understanding the modeling process and the frustrations experienced by modelers can provide valuable insights for this assessment. While research acknowledges certain instances of modelers’ dissatisfaction, its scope often limits detailed examination. This study seeks to identify and analyze the main pain points associated with domain modeling through a five-phase empirical study using a multi-method approach. We identified 71 pain points, synthesized them to 41 , and prioritized 16 as the most significant and prevalent in domain modeling. We then refined, documented, and exemplified the prioritized pain points, analyzed their potential causes, and discussed their practical implications. Our findings provide valuable insights for improving modelers’ experiences and optimizing the modeling process. • 41 pain points in structural conceptual modeling were mapped. • 16 pain points were identified as the most significant and prevalent. • Pain points may stem from a lack of experience among modelers and stakeholders. • Pain points may arise from issues with modeling methods, tools, and languages. • Pain points may arise from factors related to the organization, domain, and project.

Information and Software TechnologyVol. 183
TU Wien (AT), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unraveling the pain points of domain modeling — Henderik A. Proper, Eduardo Guerra, et al. · Information and Software Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS