Implications of renewable electricity curtailment for delivered costs

At high penetration levels, the ratio of the marginal: average curtailment of an extra MW of wind is typically 3+ times its average. For a portfolio of on- and off-shore wind and solar PV, the ratio is considerably higher. With increasing methods of using potentially surplus VRE (exports, storage) average curtailment falls but the ratio of the marginal: average curtailment rises. The marginal levelised cost of VRE is inversely proportional to the Marginal Capacity Factor, which falls as marginal curtailment increases, raising concerns that reducing average curtailment may not lower the marginal cost of VRE. This paper proves this is not the case. Reducing curtailment has a magnified effect on marginal curtailment and does indeed lower the marginal cost of VRE. • High variable renewable penetration requires curtailment. • Marginal VRE curtailment is 3+ average curtailment. • Marginal cost is inversely proportional to marginal capacity factor. • Marginal:average curtailment rises as average falls with surplus absorbed. • Marginal cost proved to fall as average curtailment falls.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108472
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implications of renewable electricity curtailment for delivered costs

David Newbery
8 citations
Energy Economics
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
5.84
article

Implications of renewable electricity curtailment for delivered costs

David Newbery
article en
8 citations

Abstract

At high penetration levels, the ratio of the marginal: average curtailment of an extra MW of wind is typically 3+ times its average. For a portfolio of on- and off-shore wind and solar PV, the ratio is considerably higher. With increasing methods of using potentially surplus VRE (exports, storage) average curtailment falls but the ratio of the marginal: average curtailment rises. The marginal levelised cost of VRE is inversely proportional to the Marginal Capacity Factor, which falls as marginal curtailment increases, raising concerns that reducing average curtailment may not lower the marginal cost of VRE. This paper proves this is not the case. Reducing curtailment has a magnified effect on marginal curtailment and does indeed lower the marginal cost of VRE. • High variable renewable penetration requires curtailment. • Marginal VRE curtailment is 3+ average curtailment. • Marginal cost is inversely proportional to marginal capacity factor. • Marginal:average curtailment rises as average falls with surplus absorbed. • Marginal cost proved to fall as average curtailment falls.

Energy EconomicsVol. 145
University of Cambridge (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
5.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implications of renewable electricity curtailment for delivered costs — David Newbery · Energy Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS