Comparison of conventional and novel rotational FNA needles using conventional microscopy and image analysis to quantitatively assess yield

This study shows that IA can help to quantitatively evaluate sample cellularity in the cell blocks from specimens acquired with different needles. A longer procedure time tended to produce more cellular samples and larger tissue fragments in the cell block for both ConvFNA and CytoCore needles and was statistically significant for CytoCore. Additional larger studies, including those with true clinical cases, should be considered to evaluate the different needle types further.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Cytopathology
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.70014
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of conventional and novel rotational FNA needles using conventional microscopy and image analysis to quantitatively assess yield

Mohammed Amer Swid, A. Y. Shen, Tariq Rahman, Amanda J. Young et al.
2 citations
Cancer Cytopathology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
2.09
article

Comparison of conventional and novel rotational FNA needles using conventional microscopy and image analysis to quantitatively assess yield

Mohammed Amer Swid, A. Y. Shen, Tariq Rahman, Amanda J. Young, Sara E. Monaco
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study shows that IA can help to quantitatively evaluate sample cellularity in the cell blocks from specimens acquired with different needles. A longer procedure time tended to produce more cellular samples and larger tissue fragments in the cell block for both ConvFNA and CytoCore needles and was statistically significant for CytoCore. Additional larger studies, including those with true clinical cases, should be considered to evaluate the different needle types further.

Cancer CytopathologyVol. 133(5)
Geisinger Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.