Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation: a long-term analysis of closed-loop scs in chronic pain treatment

Chronic low back pain is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a promising alternative for patients who do not respond to conventional treatments. SCS is a neuromodulation technique that inhibits pain transmission through electrical stimulation of the dorsal columns of the spinal cord. Recent technological innovations, including closed-loop SCS (CL-SCS) and multiphasic SCS, have significantly improved the precision and coverage of stimulation, resulting in better clinical outcomes and economic advantages. This integrative review aims to evaluate the efficacy and recent advances in spinal cord stimulation for patients with chronic back and leg pain. Ten relevant studies were analyzed, highlighting the superiority of the CL-SCS system in terms of both efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Despite high initial costs, studies suggest that CL-SCS becomes economically advantageous after five years due to its higher success rate in pain relief. On the other hand, multiphasic SCS provides broader stimulation coverage, leading to better pain control and improvements in patient quality of life. Additionally, non-invasive alternatives, such as transcutaneous direct spinal current stimulation (TSDCS), show potential as complementary or substitute therapies. The findings suggest that personalized therapy, incorporating various SCS modalities, may maximize patient outcomes. The continuous development of these techniques reinforces SCS as a key therapeutic intervention in managing chronic low back pain, providing sustained pain relief and improved quality of life.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55905/cuadv17n4-028
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation: a long-term analysis of closed-loop scs in chronic pain treatment

Fernando Jorge Corrêa Magalhães Filho, Márcia Aparecida Silva Bissaco, Leone Mendes Dias, Aline Rocha et al.
2 citations
Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo
Pain Management and Treatment
4.38
article

Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation: a long-term analysis of closed-loop scs in chronic pain treatment

Fernando Jorge Corrêa Magalhães Filho, Márcia Aparecida Silva Bissaco, Leone Mendes Dias, Aline Rocha, Cleber Silva de Oliveira, Guilherme Alves Colaço, Vitória Lorrani dos Santos, Gabriely Gomes de Sá, Almir Rodrigues Tavares, Thiago de Souza Franco, Danilo Kenzo Enomura, Bruna Soares Mucoucah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Chronic low back pain is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a promising alternative for patients who do not respond to conventional treatments. SCS is a neuromodulation technique that inhibits pain transmission through electrical stimulation of the dorsal columns of the spinal cord. Recent technological innovations, including closed-loop SCS (CL-SCS) and multiphasic SCS, have significantly improved the precision and coverage of stimulation, resulting in better clinical outcomes and economic advantages. This integrative review aims to evaluate the efficacy and recent advances in spinal cord stimulation for patients with chronic back and leg pain. Ten relevant studies were analyzed, highlighting the superiority of the CL-SCS system in terms of both efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Despite high initial costs, studies suggest that CL-SCS becomes economically advantageous after five years due to its higher success rate in pain relief. On the other hand, multiphasic SCS provides broader stimulation coverage, leading to better pain control and improvements in patient quality of life. Additionally, non-invasive alternatives, such as transcutaneous direct spinal current stimulation (TSDCS), show potential as complementary or substitute therapies. The findings suggest that personalized therapy, incorporating various SCS modalities, may maximize patient outcomes. The continuous development of these techniques reinforces SCS as a key therapeutic intervention in managing chronic low back pain, providing sustained pain relief and improved quality of life.

Cuadernos de Educación y DesarrolloVol. 17(4)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pain Management and Treatment
4.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.