Patronage Networks and Elite Cohesion in Russia: Evidence from the Recruitment of the Gubernatorial Corps

Abstract How is elite cohesion possible in a patronalistic regime? Drawing on the theory of patronal politics and social network analysis, it is shown that the federal-level elites have been involved in the decision-making with respect to the recruitment of the gubernatorial corps in Russia. The analysis has revealed a clear pattern towards the complexity and monocentrism accompanied with the growing levels of cohesion of the patronal network that combines governors and their federal patrons. It allows the authors to argue that subnational appointments can be considered as a power-sharing tool for the ruling elite. The evolution of the network structure, though with some time delay, refers to the stages ranging from a competing to a single-pyramid system in terms of Henry Hale. Over the period, elites close to the president have almost monopolized the recruitment of governors. On the other hand, the number of patrons grows gradually, preserving the increase in the levels of network cohesion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Politics
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30965/24518921-01001002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patronage Networks and Elite Cohesion in Russia: Evidence from the Recruitment of the Gubernatorial Corps

Yury Gaivoronsky, Yulian Balandin
1 citations
Russian Politics
Religion and Society Interactions
4.20
article

Patronage Networks and Elite Cohesion in Russia: Evidence from the Recruitment of the Gubernatorial Corps

Yury Gaivoronsky, Yulian Balandin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract How is elite cohesion possible in a patronalistic regime? Drawing on the theory of patronal politics and social network analysis, it is shown that the federal-level elites have been involved in the decision-making with respect to the recruitment of the gubernatorial corps in Russia. The analysis has revealed a clear pattern towards the complexity and monocentrism accompanied with the growing levels of cohesion of the patronal network that combines governors and their federal patrons. It allows the authors to argue that subnational appointments can be considered as a power-sharing tool for the ruling elite. The evolution of the network structure, though with some time delay, refers to the stages ranging from a competing to a single-pyramid system in terms of Henry Hale. Over the period, elites close to the president have almost monopolized the recruitment of governors. On the other hand, the number of patrons grows gradually, preserving the increase in the levels of network cohesion.

Russian PoliticsVol. 10(1)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Religion and Society Interactions
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.