In Search of the Roots of Failure: Reassessing Russian Politics in the 1990s

Abstract The ongoing discussion about Russian politics in the 1990s revolves around narratives of democratization (which seemingly ended in the 2000s under Vladimir Putin’s leadership) and neoliberal market reforms (which seemingly paved the way for the country’s authoritarian drift). However, it is time to reassess the Russian experience of the 1990s from a different perspective. In this article, I argue that the political and institutional foundations of the Russian personalist authoritarian regime were laid during the 1990s. The process of the Soviet collapse significantly contributed to Russia’s succession of the Soviet state and its reliance on various legacies of the Soviet Union in domestic politics and foreign policy. At the same time, Russia’s elites and leaders in the 1990s had little interest in building electoral democracy (which implies the possibility of losing power through electoral means) and intended to maximize their power amid major political and economic changes. They intentionally rejected political compromises, effectively used political polarization at every critical juncture of Russian politics in the 1990s, and opted for the least democratic solutions. While democratization in Russia during the 1990s was sacrificed for the sake of market reforms amid a long and deep transformational recession, the authoritarian turn of the country was postponed to the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Politics
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30965/24518921-01001003
Primary Topic
Russia and Soviet political economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Search of the Roots of Failure: Reassessing Russian Politics in the 1990s

Владимир Гельман
Russian Politics
Russia and Soviet political economy
article

In Search of the Roots of Failure: Reassessing Russian Politics in the 1990s

Владимир Гельман
article en

Abstract

Abstract The ongoing discussion about Russian politics in the 1990s revolves around narratives of democratization (which seemingly ended in the 2000s under Vladimir Putin’s leadership) and neoliberal market reforms (which seemingly paved the way for the country’s authoritarian drift). However, it is time to reassess the Russian experience of the 1990s from a different perspective. In this article, I argue that the political and institutional foundations of the Russian personalist authoritarian regime were laid during the 1990s. The process of the Soviet collapse significantly contributed to Russia’s succession of the Soviet state and its reliance on various legacies of the Soviet Union in domestic politics and foreign policy. At the same time, Russia’s elites and leaders in the 1990s had little interest in building electoral democracy (which implies the possibility of losing power through electoral means) and intended to maximize their power amid major political and economic changes. They intentionally rejected political compromises, effectively used political polarization at every critical juncture of Russian politics in the 1990s, and opted for the least democratic solutions. While democratization in Russia during the 1990s was sacrificed for the sake of market reforms amid a long and deep transformational recession, the authoritarian turn of the country was postponed to the future.

Russian PoliticsVol. 10(1)
University of Helsinki (FI), Life Sciences International Postgraduate Educational Center (AM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Russia and Soviet political economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.