Cardiac Rhythm Devices in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction – Role, Timing, and Optimal Use in Contemporary Practice. <i>European Journal of Heart Failure</i> Expert Consensus Document

Guidelines for management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) emphasize personalized care, patient engagement, and shared decision-making. Medications and cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices are recommended with a high level of evidence. However, there are significant disparities: patients who could benefit from devices are frequently referred too late or not at all. Misconceptions about device therapy and the notion that the needs of patients (especially the prevention of sudden cardiac death) can now be met by expanding drug therapies may play a role in these disparities. This state-of-the-art review is produced by members of the DIRECT HF initiative, a patient-centred, expert-led educational programme that aims to advance guideline-directed use of CRM devices in patients with HFrEF. This review discusses the latest evidence on the role of CRM devices in reducing HFrEF mortality and morbidity, and provides practical guidance on patient referral, device selection, implant timing and patient-centred follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3641
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiac Rhythm Devices in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction – Role, Timing, and Optimal Use in Contemporary Practice. European Journal of Heart Failure Expert Consensus Document

Gianluigi Savarese, Antoni Bayés‐Genís, Biykem Bozkurt, Loreena Hill et al.
4 citations
European Journal of Heart Failure
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
5.55
article

Cardiac Rhythm Devices in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction – Role, Timing, and Optimal Use in Contemporary Practice. European Journal of Heart Failure Expert Consensus Document

Gianluigi Savarese, Antoni Bayés‐Genís, Biykem Bozkurt, Loreena Hill, Cecilia M. Linde, Koichiro Kinugawa, William T. Abraham, Giuseppe Rosano, Javed Butler, Alexandre Mebazaa, Shelley R. Zieroth, Wilfried Müllens, Naoki Sato, Andrea Russo, Michael Böhm, C. Leclercq
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Guidelines for management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) emphasize personalized care, patient engagement, and shared decision-making. Medications and cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices are recommended with a high level of evidence. However, there are significant disparities: patients who could benefit from devices are frequently referred too late or not at all. Misconceptions about device therapy and the notion that the needs of patients (especially the prevention of sudden cardiac death) can now be met by expanding drug therapies may play a role in these disparities. This state-of-the-art review is produced by members of the DIRECT HF initiative, a patient-centred, expert-led educational programme that aims to advance guideline-directed use of CRM devices in patients with HFrEF. This review discusses the latest evidence on the role of CRM devices in reducing HFrEF mortality and morbidity, and provides practical guidance on patient referral, device selection, implant timing and patient-centred follow-up.

European Journal of Heart FailureVol. 27(7)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Queen's University Belfast (GB), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Inserm (FR), St George's, University of London (GB), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Università degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale (IT), Université Paris Cité (FR), Karolinska Institutet (SE), San Raffaele University of Rome (IT), Université Rennes 2 (FR), University of Mississippi (US), Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (ES), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Baylor Medical Center at Garland (US), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), Noguchi Hospital (JP), Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (BE), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Toyama (JP), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT), City St George's, University of London (GB), University of Manitoba (CA), The Ohio State University (US), Université de Rennes (FR), Hasselt University (BE), Saarland University (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
5.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.