Use of Spatially Distributed <scp>TOPMODEL</scp> to Assess the Effectiveness of Diverse Natural Flood Management Techniques in a <scp>UK</scp> Catchment

ABSTRACT While natural flood management (NFM) is becoming more widely used, there remains a lack of empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness. The primary uncertainties arise from two key aspects: first, the determination of NFM effectiveness is constrained by the relatively small catchment scales studied to date; second, the combination of multiple NFM interventions within a catchment may lead to flood peak synchronisation. In this study, both instream and terrestrial NFM interventions were modelled using a spatially distributed hydrological model, Spatially Distributed TOPMODEL (SD‐TOPMODEL). To demonstrate how the scale and type of interventions interact to influence flood peaks, we integrated various NFM interventions and land cover changes, including woodland planting, soil aeration, floodplain restoration, and hedgerow planting. In comparison to previous versions of SD‐TOPMODEL, we improved simulation efficiency to enable grid‐based modelling of up to a 200‐year return period flood event for an 81.4 km 2 catchment with 5 m resolution. Following extensive parameter calibration and validation, the model demonstrated stability and provided a reliable fit for flood peaks, achieving a Nash‐Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient of up to 0.93 between modelled and observed discharge. The results highlighted the effectiveness of NFM interventions in reducing flood peaks at the scale studied, particularly during single‐peaked storm events and under dry pre‐event catchment conditions. Moreover, the combined use of multiple interventions was more effective and resilient than single interventions, with flood peak reductions ranging from 4.2% to 16.0% in the study catchment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70122
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Spatially Distributed TOPMODEL to Assess the Effectiveness of Diverse Natural Flood Management Techniques in a UK Catchment

Joseph Holden, Thomas Willis, Megan Klaar, Qiuyu Zhu
3 citations
Hydrological Processes
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
2.45
article

Use of Spatially Distributed TOPMODEL to Assess the Effectiveness of Diverse Natural Flood Management Techniques in a UK Catchment

Joseph Holden, Thomas Willis, Megan Klaar, Qiuyu Zhu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT While natural flood management (NFM) is becoming more widely used, there remains a lack of empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness. The primary uncertainties arise from two key aspects: first, the determination of NFM effectiveness is constrained by the relatively small catchment scales studied to date; second, the combination of multiple NFM interventions within a catchment may lead to flood peak synchronisation. In this study, both instream and terrestrial NFM interventions were modelled using a spatially distributed hydrological model, Spatially Distributed TOPMODEL (SD‐TOPMODEL). To demonstrate how the scale and type of interventions interact to influence flood peaks, we integrated various NFM interventions and land cover changes, including woodland planting, soil aeration, floodplain restoration, and hedgerow planting. In comparison to previous versions of SD‐TOPMODEL, we improved simulation efficiency to enable grid‐based modelling of up to a 200‐year return period flood event for an 81.4 km 2 catchment with 5 m resolution. Following extensive parameter calibration and validation, the model demonstrated stability and provided a reliable fit for flood peaks, achieving a Nash‐Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient of up to 0.93 between modelled and observed discharge. The results highlighted the effectiveness of NFM interventions in reducing flood peaks at the scale studied, particularly during single‐peaked storm events and under dry pre‐event catchment conditions. Moreover, the combined use of multiple interventions was more effective and resilient than single interventions, with flood peak reductions ranging from 4.2% to 16.0% in the study catchment.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 39(4)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
University of Leeds
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.