Considering the ‘Development’ Potential of Property Rights in Response to Environmental Problems

Considering the ‘Development’ Potential of Property Rights in Response to Environmental Problems There has increasingly been a shift in how property rights have been conceived in the context of environmental degradation. While property rights have traditionally focused on the right to exclude others from a particular resource and to provide a basis for the right to exploit certain resources, there has been a shift to a more malleable vision where these rights have developed or widened in response to environmental problems. This article argues that this shift has occurred owing to the needs presented by the ‘heat’ of environmental law, characterised by systemic complexity, scientific uncertainty and resource management. In this sense, the key tussle between property law and environmental law lies in their preoccupations between the notions of ‘exploitation’ and ‘management’, respectively. This article attempts to reconcile this apparent conflict and presents a more cohesive picture between these two bodies of law. It does so by responding to three questions – what, when and how – that is, what ‘property rights’ are; when they are needed or ‘developed’ in the context of environmental law; and, finally, the various forms in which they may be characterised, showing how they deal with the needs presented by environmental law. These various ‘forms’, it is argued, have the capacity to foster environmental protection in diverse ways, while also balancing property law’s promises of the ‘right to exclude and exploit’. In dealing with these questions, this article draws from various jurisdictions to illustrate the malleability of property rights as a site for environmental protection.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Erasmus Law Review
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/elr.000282
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering the ‘Development’ Potential of Property Rights in Response to Environmental Problems

Mahima Balaji
Erasmus Law Review
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
article

Considering the ‘Development’ Potential of Property Rights in Response to Environmental Problems

Mahima Balaji
article en

Abstract

Considering the ‘Development’ Potential of Property Rights in Response to Environmental Problems There has increasingly been a shift in how property rights have been conceived in the context of environmental degradation. While property rights have traditionally focused on the right to exclude others from a particular resource and to provide a basis for the right to exploit certain resources, there has been a shift to a more malleable vision where these rights have developed or widened in response to environmental problems. This article argues that this shift has occurred owing to the needs presented by the ‘heat’ of environmental law, characterised by systemic complexity, scientific uncertainty and resource management. In this sense, the key tussle between property law and environmental law lies in their preoccupations between the notions of ‘exploitation’ and ‘management’, respectively. This article attempts to reconcile this apparent conflict and presents a more cohesive picture between these two bodies of law. It does so by responding to three questions – what, when and how – that is, what ‘property rights’ are; when they are needed or ‘developed’ in the context of environmental law; and, finally, the various forms in which they may be characterised, showing how they deal with the needs presented by environmental law. These various ‘forms’, it is argued, have the capacity to foster environmental protection in diverse ways, while also balancing property law’s promises of the ‘right to exclude and exploit’. In dealing with these questions, this article draws from various jurisdictions to illustrate the malleability of property rights as a site for environmental protection.

Erasmus Law ReviewVol. 17(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.