Pelvic Exenteration (PE) in Gynecological Cancers: Indications, Complications and Overall Survival (OS) Analysis

Background & Objective: The surgical procedure known as pelvic exenteration (PE) involves removing lower abdominopelvic structures as a single unit. Despite its high morbidity, this procedure is primarily used to manage advanced primary or locally recurrent pelvic cancers. Our study aims to assess our experiences with PE over the past 8 years. We identified patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for gynecological cancers between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2019 through hospital records.Materials & Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics, procedural indications, surgical details, and patient outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, while Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model survival outcomes.Results: Twenty-one patients with recurrent cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and/or vaginal cancer underwent pelvic exenteration. Local disease recurrence accounted for 80.9% of procedural indications, with 80.9% originating from the cervix and 9.5% from the endometrium. Sixty-two percent underwent PE with curative intent, while 38% had palliative objectives. Wound infection was the commonest early complication, and late complications included deep vein thrombosis, lymphocyte formation, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Median survival rates were 85.7% at 6 months and 57.1% at 12 months. Our five-year OS, as calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, was 54.3% (95% CI 34.2, 74.6).Conclusion: Our case series demonstrates that pelvic exenteration offers approximately a 54.3% 5-year survival chance in a selected cohort of patients. Early and late complication rates align with historical descriptions. Pelvic exenteration leads to sustained survival in specific patients, and ongoing efforts should prioritize identifying those who could benefit most from this procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer Research
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30699/jogcr.10.5.375
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ureteral procedures and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pelvic Exenteration (PE) in Gynecological Cancers: Indications, Complications and Overall Survival (OS) Analysis

Muralitharan Ganesalingam, Kavitha Nagandla, Yong Chee Meng, Y. Hua
1 citations
Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer Research
Ureteral procedures and complications
2.06
article

Pelvic Exenteration (PE) in Gynecological Cancers: Indications, Complications and Overall Survival (OS) Analysis

Muralitharan Ganesalingam, Kavitha Nagandla, Yong Chee Meng, Y. Hua
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background & Objective: The surgical procedure known as pelvic exenteration (PE) involves removing lower abdominopelvic structures as a single unit. Despite its high morbidity, this procedure is primarily used to manage advanced primary or locally recurrent pelvic cancers. Our study aims to assess our experiences with PE over the past 8 years. We identified patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for gynecological cancers between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2019 through hospital records.Materials & Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics, procedural indications, surgical details, and patient outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, while Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model survival outcomes.Results: Twenty-one patients with recurrent cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and/or vaginal cancer underwent pelvic exenteration. Local disease recurrence accounted for 80.9% of procedural indications, with 80.9% originating from the cervix and 9.5% from the endometrium. Sixty-two percent underwent PE with curative intent, while 38% had palliative objectives. Wound infection was the commonest early complication, and late complications included deep vein thrombosis, lymphocyte formation, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Median survival rates were 85.7% at 6 months and 57.1% at 12 months. Our five-year OS, as calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, was 54.3% (95% CI 34.2, 74.6).Conclusion: Our case series demonstrates that pelvic exenteration offers approximately a 54.3% 5-year survival chance in a selected cohort of patients. Early and late complication rates align with historical descriptions. Pelvic exenteration leads to sustained survival in specific patients, and ongoing efforts should prioritize identifying those who could benefit most from this procedure.

Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer ResearchVol. 10(5)
IMU University (MY)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ureteral procedures and complications
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.