Development and validation of prediction algorithm to identify tuberculosis in two large California health systems

California data demonstrate failures in latent tuberculosis screening to prevent progression to tuberculosis disease. Therefore, we developed a clinical risk prediction model for tuberculosis disease using electronic health records. This study included Kaiser Permanente Southern California and Northern California members ≥18 years during 2008-2019. Models used Cox proportional hazards regression, Harrell's C-statistic, and a simulated TB disease outcome accounting for cases prevented by current screening which includes both observed and simulated cases. We compared sensitivity and number-needed-to-screen for model-identified high-risk individuals with current screening. Of 4,032,619 and 4,051,873 Southern and Northern California members, tuberculosis disease incidences were 4.1 and 3.3 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The final model C-statistic was 0.816 (95% simulation interval 0.805-0.824). Model sensitivity screening high-risk individuals was 0.70 (0.68-0.71) and number-needed-to-screen was 662 (646-679) persons-per tuberculosis disease case, compared to a sensitivity of 0.36 (0.34-0.38) and number-needed-to-screen of 1632 (1485-1774) with current screening. Here, we show our predictive model improves tuberculosis screening efficiency in California.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58775-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of prediction algorithm to identify tuberculosis in two large California health systems

Bruno Lewin, Sally F. Shaw, Parag Mahale, Sara Y. Tartof et al.
2 citations
Nature Communications
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
2.79
article

Development and validation of prediction algorithm to identify tuberculosis in two large California health systems

Bruno Lewin, Sally F. Shaw, Parag Mahale, Sara Y. Tartof, Katia J. Bruxvoort, Jacek Skarbinski, Brigitte Spence, Zhuoxin Li, Jennifer H Ku, Lei Qian, Heidi Fischer, Yuching Ni, Saadiq Garba
article en
2 citations

Abstract

California data demonstrate failures in latent tuberculosis screening to prevent progression to tuberculosis disease. Therefore, we developed a clinical risk prediction model for tuberculosis disease using electronic health records. This study included Kaiser Permanente Southern California and Northern California members ≥18 years during 2008-2019. Models used Cox proportional hazards regression, Harrell's C-statistic, and a simulated TB disease outcome accounting for cases prevented by current screening which includes both observed and simulated cases. We compared sensitivity and number-needed-to-screen for model-identified high-risk individuals with current screening. Of 4,032,619 and 4,051,873 Southern and Northern California members, tuberculosis disease incidences were 4.1 and 3.3 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The final model C-statistic was 0.816 (95% simulation interval 0.805-0.824). Model sensitivity screening high-risk individuals was 0.70 (0.68-0.71) and number-needed-to-screen was 662 (646-679) persons-per tuberculosis disease case, compared to a sensitivity of 0.36 (0.34-0.38) and number-needed-to-screen of 1632 (1485-1774) with current screening. Here, we show our predictive model improves tuberculosis screening efficiency in California.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Kaiser Permanente (US), Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Los Angeles Medical Center (US)
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Kaiser Permanente
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.