Genome editing in neurodegenerative diseases: risk analysis, technological challenges, and prospects for clinical application

Objective. To analyze the potential risks and technological limitations of using genome editing methods in neurodegenerative diseases, as well as to assess the prospects for their implementation in clinical practice. Material and methods. A systematic analysis of the literature for the period 2014–2024 in the databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, SAGE Premier, Springer and Wiley Journals. The key risks of using genome editing technologies are considered, including inappropriate effects, immunological reactions, and long-term consequences of changes in the DNA of nervous tissue. Results. The main technological limitations are analyzed, including problems of delivery across the blood-brain barrier, low editing efficiency in postmitotic neurons, and the complexity of long-term expression of components of editing systems. The prospects of introducing technologies into clinical practice are assessed, taking into account the current regulatory landscape in various countries. Conclusion. Despite significant technological challenges and potential risks, the development of genome editing techniques opens up prospects for the creation of effective treatments for neurodegenerative diseases. Key areas of further research include improving the safety and specificity of editing, optimizing delivery systems, and developing methods for long-term monitoring of the effects of genetic modifications in the nervous system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molekulyarnaya Meditsina (Molecular medicine)
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29296/24999490-2025-02-03
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genome editing in neurodegenerative diseases: risk analysis, technological challenges, and prospects for clinical application

T. Potupchik, О. Ф. Веселова, L. Evert, A. Melnikova et al.
Molekulyarnaya Meditsina (Molecular medicine)
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Genome editing in neurodegenerative diseases: risk analysis, technological challenges, and prospects for clinical application

T. Potupchik, О. Ф. Веселова, L. Evert, A. Melnikova, I. Svetlakova, B. Panchenko, R. Kudasheva
article en

Abstract

Objective. To analyze the potential risks and technological limitations of using genome editing methods in neurodegenerative diseases, as well as to assess the prospects for their implementation in clinical practice. Material and methods. A systematic analysis of the literature for the period 2014–2024 in the databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, SAGE Premier, Springer and Wiley Journals. The key risks of using genome editing technologies are considered, including inappropriate effects, immunological reactions, and long-term consequences of changes in the DNA of nervous tissue. Results. The main technological limitations are analyzed, including problems of delivery across the blood-brain barrier, low editing efficiency in postmitotic neurons, and the complexity of long-term expression of components of editing systems. The prospects of introducing technologies into clinical practice are assessed, taking into account the current regulatory landscape in various countries. Conclusion. Despite significant technological challenges and potential risks, the development of genome editing techniques opens up prospects for the creation of effective treatments for neurodegenerative diseases. Key areas of further research include improving the safety and specificity of editing, optimizing delivery systems, and developing methods for long-term monitoring of the effects of genetic modifications in the nervous system.

Molekulyarnaya Meditsina (Molecular medicine)
Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center (RU), Krasnoyarsk State Medical University (RU), Research Institute of Medical Problems of the North (RU), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RU), Bashkir State Medical University (RU), Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.