Much deeper and simpler: Pasinetti’s reassessment of Prebisch’s centre–periphery approach

Pasinetti’s analysis of underdeveloped economies in his 1981 book reveals a striking similarity with Raul Prebisch’s well-known centre–periphery approach. Pasinetti’s reference to Prebisch’s work reinforces such a thesis. However, a careful comparative analysis also reveals these authors’ methodological and analytical differences. While Pasinetti’s work was situated in a pre-institutional (and logical-deductive) plane, Prebisch’s approach merged economic, historical and institutional data into an empirical analysis. In addition, Pasinetti drew on some very specific and homogeneous sources (Leontief, Sraffa and Marx), whereas Prebisch revealed an eclectic attitude to economic literature. Such differences, however, did not imply different conclusions. On this level of the analysis, Pasinetti and Prebisch show a clear resemblance, emphasising the pivotal role of industrialisation for developing countries and the controversial role of international trade.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Keynesian Economics
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2025.02.01
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Much deeper and simpler: Pasinetti’s reassessment of Prebisch’s centre–periphery approach

Roberto Lampa, Florencia Sember
Review of Keynesian Economics
Economic Theory and Policy
article

Much deeper and simpler: Pasinetti’s reassessment of Prebisch’s centre–periphery approach

Roberto Lampa, Florencia Sember
article en

Abstract

Pasinetti’s analysis of underdeveloped economies in his 1981 book reveals a striking similarity with Raul Prebisch’s well-known centre–periphery approach. Pasinetti’s reference to Prebisch’s work reinforces such a thesis. However, a careful comparative analysis also reveals these authors’ methodological and analytical differences. While Pasinetti’s work was situated in a pre-institutional (and logical-deductive) plane, Prebisch’s approach merged economic, historical and institutional data into an empirical analysis. In addition, Pasinetti drew on some very specific and homogeneous sources (Leontief, Sraffa and Marx), whereas Prebisch revealed an eclectic attitude to economic literature. Such differences, however, did not imply different conclusions. On this level of the analysis, Pasinetti and Prebisch show a clear resemblance, emphasising the pivotal role of industrialisation for developing countries and the controversial role of international trade.

Review of Keynesian EconomicsVol. 13(2)
University of Milan (IT), University of Macerata (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Economic Theory and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Much deeper and simpler: Pasinetti’s reassessment of Prebisch’s centre–periphery approach — Roberto Lampa, Florencia Sember · Review of Keynesian Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS