Preference heterogeneity in a dynamic flow congestion model

• Preference heterogeneity in a dynamic flow congestion model. • Social optimum is found by solving a multi-point optimal control problem using a Hamiltonian method. • Analyze the equilibrium arrival rates, arrival intervals, congestion externalities, and tolls. • Analyze the distributional effects of dynamic congestion pricing. The bottleneck model has dominated the field on dynamic congestion, as it is tractable and has closed-form solutions. But it has rather specific outcomes that do not occur in most other dynamic models or under static congestion. In the bottleneck model, pricing can remove all travel delays while keeping the generalized price unchanged, making pricing much more beneficial than in other models. Thus, it is important to see how pricing performs in other models. We do so by adding discrete preference heterogeneity to a dynamic flow congestion model, and we study the efficiency and distributional effects of pricing. By formulating a multi-point optimal-control problem using Hamiltonians, we derive the social optimum and analyze the properties of travel equilibrium. Solving our model is more complex than solving the bottleneck model, but still results in closed-from solutions, whereas most other dynamic congestion models have no such solutions. Without tolling, the arrival order is determined by the ratio of the value of time (VOT) to the value of schedule delay, as in the bottleneck model. However, unlike the bottleneck model, the same holds for the social optimum when only the VOT differs across users (as tolling cannot eliminate all travel time delays). In our model, users with a lower VOT always lose from tolling, while those with a higher VOT may gain or lose, depending on the parameters. Compared to the bottleneck model, tolling is less beneficial for society, lengthens the peak, and hurts users more. Our findings reveal the significance of considering congestion type and preference heterogeneity in assessing the implementation of congestion tolling.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part B Methodological
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2025.103193
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preference heterogeneity in a dynamic flow congestion model

Vincent A.C. van den Berg, Erik T. Verhoef, Xiaojuan Yu
1 citations
Transportation Research Part B Methodological
Transportation Planning and Optimization
2.18
article

Preference heterogeneity in a dynamic flow congestion model

Vincent A.C. van den Berg, Erik T. Verhoef, Xiaojuan Yu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Preference heterogeneity in a dynamic flow congestion model. • Social optimum is found by solving a multi-point optimal control problem using a Hamiltonian method. • Analyze the equilibrium arrival rates, arrival intervals, congestion externalities, and tolls. • Analyze the distributional effects of dynamic congestion pricing. The bottleneck model has dominated the field on dynamic congestion, as it is tractable and has closed-form solutions. But it has rather specific outcomes that do not occur in most other dynamic models or under static congestion. In the bottleneck model, pricing can remove all travel delays while keeping the generalized price unchanged, making pricing much more beneficial than in other models. Thus, it is important to see how pricing performs in other models. We do so by adding discrete preference heterogeneity to a dynamic flow congestion model, and we study the efficiency and distributional effects of pricing. By formulating a multi-point optimal-control problem using Hamiltonians, we derive the social optimum and analyze the properties of travel equilibrium. Solving our model is more complex than solving the bottleneck model, but still results in closed-from solutions, whereas most other dynamic congestion models have no such solutions. Without tolling, the arrival order is determined by the ratio of the value of time (VOT) to the value of schedule delay, as in the bottleneck model. However, unlike the bottleneck model, the same holds for the social optimum when only the VOT differs across users (as tolling cannot eliminate all travel time delays). In our model, users with a lower VOT always lose from tolling, while those with a higher VOT may gain or lose, depending on the parameters. Compared to the bottleneck model, tolling is less beneficial for society, lengthens the peak, and hurts users more. Our findings reveal the significance of considering congestion type and preference heterogeneity in assessing the implementation of congestion tolling.

Transportation Research Part B MethodologicalVol. 195
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
2.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preference heterogeneity in a dynamic flow congestion model — Vincent A.C. van den Berg, Erik T. Verhoef, et al. · Transportation Research Part B Methodological (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS