Amino acid analysis using multiple time point hydrolysis and non-linear regression for determination of amino acid profiles and 21-hour correction factors of biological standards, and dairy cattle milk, tissue, rumen microbes, and various feeds

Data published over the last few years has demonstrated that the amino acids (AA) concentrations of milk and other substrates was not correctly described after the standard 21–24 h hydrolysis period, used to break down protein into its constituent AA, and that longer or shorter hydrolysis times might be needed for certain AA. The study objective was to determine the AA composition of ruminant tissue, milk, microbes, and feeds using multiple time-point hydrolysis and non-linear regression to establish optimal AA profiles and develop correction factors for single time-point hydrolysis. The AA were analyzed using this approach on sixteen feeds, nine cattle tissue samples, eight milk samples, and six ruminal microbial samples to represent both supply and requirement protein sources. Substrates were analyzed by HPLC-UV and/or HILIC-TQMS following hydrolysis at 110 °C in a block heater for 10–14 different time points ranging from 2 to 360 h using acid and alkaline hydrolysis. Following hydrolysis, least-squares non-linear regression was used to determine the true AA content. Many AA of all substrates continued to be released after the 24 h endpoint and were all observed to be declining by 360 h. The branched-chain AA (BCAA), Ser, Thr and Trp were found to need the highest correction due to hydrolysis loss or incomplete recovery, but most AA had some correction depending on the protein source. This leads to the conclusion that there is currently an underestimation of the AA concentration in ruminant substrates. Correction factors varied among protein substrates and trended or were significantly different for Ala, Arg, Asp, Glu, Trp, and Val ( P ≤ 0.10). Protein-specific factors could help improve AA formulation for improved predictions of nutrient supply and requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116338
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Amino acid analysis using multiple time point hydrolysis and non-linear regression for determination of amino acid profiles and 21-hour correction factors of biological standards, and dairy cattle milk, tissue, rumen microbes, and various feeds

M.E. Van Amburgh, Rebecca Coombe, D.A. Ross, Joyce L. Marumo et al.
3 citations
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
5.71
article

Amino acid analysis using multiple time point hydrolysis and non-linear regression for determination of amino acid profiles and 21-hour correction factors of biological standards, and dairy cattle milk, tissue, rumen microbes, and various feeds

M.E. Van Amburgh, Rebecca Coombe, D.A. Ross, Joyce L. Marumo, Amandine Benoit, Andres F. Ortega
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Data published over the last few years has demonstrated that the amino acids (AA) concentrations of milk and other substrates was not correctly described after the standard 21–24 h hydrolysis period, used to break down protein into its constituent AA, and that longer or shorter hydrolysis times might be needed for certain AA. The study objective was to determine the AA composition of ruminant tissue, milk, microbes, and feeds using multiple time-point hydrolysis and non-linear regression to establish optimal AA profiles and develop correction factors for single time-point hydrolysis. The AA were analyzed using this approach on sixteen feeds, nine cattle tissue samples, eight milk samples, and six ruminal microbial samples to represent both supply and requirement protein sources. Substrates were analyzed by HPLC-UV and/or HILIC-TQMS following hydrolysis at 110 °C in a block heater for 10–14 different time points ranging from 2 to 360 h using acid and alkaline hydrolysis. Following hydrolysis, least-squares non-linear regression was used to determine the true AA content. Many AA of all substrates continued to be released after the 24 h endpoint and were all observed to be declining by 360 h. The branched-chain AA (BCAA), Ser, Thr and Trp were found to need the highest correction due to hydrolysis loss or incomplete recovery, but most AA had some correction depending on the protein source. This leads to the conclusion that there is currently an underestimation of the AA concentration in ruminant substrates. Correction factors varied among protein substrates and trended or were significantly different for Ala, Arg, Asp, Glu, Trp, and Val ( P ≤ 0.10). Protein-specific factors could help improve AA formulation for improved predictions of nutrient supply and requirements.

Animal Feed Science and TechnologyVol. 325
Cornell University (US)
Cornell University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
5.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.