Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin by Kidney Function in Atrial Fibrillation

Key Points This real-world study involved a large cohort of 38,598 adults with atrial fibrillation from five jurisdictions across Australia and Canada. This study supports the use of apixaban as a safe and effective alternative to warfarin for atrial fibrillation across differing levels of kidney function. This study also adds important safety data on the use of apixaban in patients with reduced kidney function. Background Evidence to guide the use of apixaban in people with atrial fibrillation (AF) and CKD in routine clinical practice has been limited. We assessed comparative safety (major bleeding) and effectiveness (ischemic stroke and death) of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with AF across the spectrum of non–dialysis-dependent CKD using large, routinely collected data. Methods We combined findings from five retrospective cohorts (2013–2018) across Australia and Canada. Adults with AF, new dispensation of apixaban or warfarin, and a recorded eGFR grouped as ≥60, 45–59, 30–44, and <30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 were included. Patients on dialysis or kidney transplant recipients were excluded. We assessed outcomes within 1 year of initiating either therapy: ( 1 ) composite of all-cause death, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack and ( 2 ) first hospitalization for major bleeding (intracranial, gastrointestinal, or other). Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs; 95% confidence intervals) for outcomes across eGFR categories, after 1:1 matching using propensity scores. We summarized center-level data using random effects meta-analysis. Results Among 38,598 matched apixaban and warfarin users, there were 4130 (10.7%) ischemic and 697 (1.8%) bleeding events within 1 year. Apixaban was associated with lower or similar risk for the ischemic outcome compared with warfarin in all eGFR categories (pooled HRs [95% confidence interval]: 0.78 [0.64 to 0.94], 0.77 [0.62 to 0.97], 0.82 [0.68 to 0.98], and 0.99 [0.68 to 1.45] for eGFR ≥60, 45–59, 30–44, and <30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , respectively). Apixaban was associated with lower or similar risk of bleeding across the range of kidney function (pooled HRs: 0.55 [0.43 to 0.69], 0.73 [0.52 to 1.02], 0.55 [0.31 to 0.97], and 0.68 [0.47 to 0.99], respectively). There was no significant heterogeneity across jurisdictions or eGFR categories. Conclusions In adults with AF and non–dialysis-dependent CKD, apixaban compared with warfarin was associated with lower or similar risk of ischemic and bleeding outcomes. Our results suggest that apixaban offers a favorable risk-benefit ratio in patients with AF independent of kidney function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kidney360
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34067/kid.0000000809
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin by Kidney Function in Atrial Fibrillation

Amit X. Garg, Sarah E. Bota, Peter Birks, Eric McArthur et al.
1 citations
Kidney360
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
1.39
article

Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin by Kidney Function in Atrial Fibrillation

Amit X. Garg, Sarah E. Bota, Peter Birks, Eric McArthur, Jeffrey T. Ha, Reid Whitlock, Carinna Hockham, Manish M. Sood, Dickson Lam, Adeera Levin, Matthew Thomas James, Ziv Harel, Anish Scaria, Selena Shao, Sunil V. Badve, Jason G. Andrade, Martin Gallagher, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Min Jun, Anna Campain, Navdeep Tangri, Pietro Ravani, Zhi Tan, Meg Jardine, Ognjenka Djurdjev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Key Points This real-world study involved a large cohort of 38,598 adults with atrial fibrillation from five jurisdictions across Australia and Canada. This study supports the use of apixaban as a safe and effective alternative to warfarin for atrial fibrillation across differing levels of kidney function. This study also adds important safety data on the use of apixaban in patients with reduced kidney function. Background Evidence to guide the use of apixaban in people with atrial fibrillation (AF) and CKD in routine clinical practice has been limited. We assessed comparative safety (major bleeding) and effectiveness (ischemic stroke and death) of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with AF across the spectrum of non–dialysis-dependent CKD using large, routinely collected data. Methods We combined findings from five retrospective cohorts (2013–2018) across Australia and Canada. Adults with AF, new dispensation of apixaban or warfarin, and a recorded eGFR grouped as ≥60, 45–59, 30–44, and <30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 were included. Patients on dialysis or kidney transplant recipients were excluded. We assessed outcomes within 1 year of initiating either therapy: ( 1 ) composite of all-cause death, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack and ( 2 ) first hospitalization for major bleeding (intracranial, gastrointestinal, or other). Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs; 95% confidence intervals) for outcomes across eGFR categories, after 1:1 matching using propensity scores. We summarized center-level data using random effects meta-analysis. Results Among 38,598 matched apixaban and warfarin users, there were 4130 (10.7%) ischemic and 697 (1.8%) bleeding events within 1 year. Apixaban was associated with lower or similar risk for the ischemic outcome compared with warfarin in all eGFR categories (pooled HRs [95% confidence interval]: 0.78 [0.64 to 0.94], 0.77 [0.62 to 0.97], 0.82 [0.68 to 0.98], and 0.99 [0.68 to 1.45] for eGFR ≥60, 45–59, 30–44, and <30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , respectively). Apixaban was associated with lower or similar risk of bleeding across the range of kidney function (pooled HRs: 0.55 [0.43 to 0.69], 0.73 [0.52 to 1.02], 0.55 [0.31 to 0.97], and 0.68 [0.47 to 0.99], respectively). There was no significant heterogeneity across jurisdictions or eGFR categories. Conclusions In adults with AF and non–dialysis-dependent CKD, apixaban compared with warfarin was associated with lower or similar risk of ischemic and bleeding outcomes. Our results suggest that apixaban offers a favorable risk-benefit ratio in patients with AF independent of kidney function.

Kidney360Vol. 6(9)
Western University (CA), The University of Sydney (AU), St. Michael's Hospital (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), The George Institute for Global Health (GB), Seven Oaks General Hospital (CA), Concord Repatriation General Hospital (AU), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Liverpool Hospital (AU), London Health Sciences Centre (CA), Wollongong Hospital (AU), Vancouver General Hospital (CA), UNSW Sydney (AU), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA), National Health and Medical Research Council (AU), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), University of Manitoba (CA), Imperial College London (GB), Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.