Algorithms for Affirmative Action

This paper illustrates how fundamental concepts from optimization—such as greedy algorithms, matroids, maximum weight matching, and NP-completeness—arise in domains where policymakers wish to select a set of applicants while ensuring representation for specific groups. Examples of such settings include visa lotteries in the United States, the election for Chile’s constitutional assembly, affordable housing lotteries in New York City, selection for Indian civil service positions, and admission to Indian and Brazilian universities. By providing these examples alongside sample exercises, I aim to offer educators tools to make optimization theory accessible to students at all levels, while highlighting its policy relevance. Supplemental Material: The online data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2023.0039 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INFORMS Transactions on Education
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2023.0039
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithms for Affirmative Action

Nick Arnosti
INFORMS Transactions on Education
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Algorithms for Affirmative Action

Nick Arnosti
article en

Abstract

This paper illustrates how fundamental concepts from optimization—such as greedy algorithms, matroids, maximum weight matching, and NP-completeness—arise in domains where policymakers wish to select a set of applicants while ensuring representation for specific groups. Examples of such settings include visa lotteries in the United States, the election for Chile’s constitutional assembly, affordable housing lotteries in New York City, selection for Indian civil service positions, and admission to Indian and Brazilian universities. By providing these examples alongside sample exercises, I aim to offer educators tools to make optimization theory accessible to students at all levels, while highlighting its policy relevance. Supplemental Material: The online data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2023.0039 .

INFORMS Transactions on EducationVol. 26(2)
University of Minnesota (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.