Macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy under an energy supply shock

We study the macroeconomic effects of four fiscal policy responses to an energy supply shock: energy vouchers to all households, energy vouchers only to low-income households, energy vouchers to non-energy goods producers, and subsidies for investments in the energy sector. The analysis is carried out in a DSGE model that explicitly includes the energy sector. Calibrating the model to Swedish data, our results show that subsidies for investment in the energy sector are the most effective instrument to reduce energy prices in the short to medium term. However, this policy is welfare-dominated by energy vouchers given to households, as it immediately compensates low-income, non-saving households in the event of a shock. Providing energy vouchers to non-energy firms prevents energy prices from falling as quickly as they would without policy intervention and is also the least desirable from a welfare perspective. • We study policy responses to an energy supply shock. • We use a DSGE model. • Subsidies for investment reduce energy price the most. • Energy vouchers are preferable from welfare perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Policy
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114616
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy under an energy supply shock

Johan Gustafsson, Junior Maih, Xiaofei Ma, Mattias Vesterberg
Energy Policy
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
article

Macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy under an energy supply shock

Johan Gustafsson, Junior Maih, Xiaofei Ma, Mattias Vesterberg
article en

Abstract

We study the macroeconomic effects of four fiscal policy responses to an energy supply shock: energy vouchers to all households, energy vouchers only to low-income households, energy vouchers to non-energy goods producers, and subsidies for investments in the energy sector. The analysis is carried out in a DSGE model that explicitly includes the energy sector. Calibrating the model to Swedish data, our results show that subsidies for investment in the energy sector are the most effective instrument to reduce energy prices in the short to medium term. However, this policy is welfare-dominated by energy vouchers given to households, as it immediately compensates low-income, non-saving households in the event of a shock. Providing energy vouchers to non-energy firms prevents energy prices from falling as quickly as they would without policy intervention and is also the least desirable from a welfare perspective. • We study policy responses to an energy supply shock. • We use a DSGE model. • Subsidies for investment reduce energy price the most. • Energy vouchers are preferable from welfare perspective.

Energy PolicyVol. 203
Norges Bank, Umeå University (SE), ESSCA School of Management (FR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.