Human trust in AI: a relationship beyond reliance

Abstract Trust in artificial intelligence (AI) is often discussed by both the general public and a part of academia. The discourse on trust in AI is often presented as analogous to trust in people. However, it is unclear whether the concept of trust can suitably be extended to describe relationships between humans and other entities. In this article, I will argue that the main features of trusting relationships apply both when the trustee is a human or an AI system. This view is opposed to the claim that only humans can be trusted and that technology, at its best, can be just relied on. However, it is commonly accepted that reliance has weaker implications than trust. We often rely on those whom we need or want to do something for us, regardless of their motivation to act. I will argue that motivation is relevant for trust, both in humans and in AI. Because of this, I propose trust as a suitable goal to aim for when shaping human-AI relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00690-z
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human trust in AI: a relationship beyond reliance

Sara Blanco
10 citations
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
23.66
article

Human trust in AI: a relationship beyond reliance

Sara Blanco
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Abstract Trust in artificial intelligence (AI) is often discussed by both the general public and a part of academia. The discourse on trust in AI is often presented as analogous to trust in people. However, it is unclear whether the concept of trust can suitably be extended to describe relationships between humans and other entities. In this article, I will argue that the main features of trusting relationships apply both when the trustee is a human or an AI system. This view is opposed to the claim that only humans can be trusted and that technology, at its best, can be just relied on. However, it is commonly accepted that reliance has weaker implications than trust. We often rely on those whom we need or want to do something for us, regardless of their motivation to act. I will argue that motivation is relevant for trust, both in humans and in AI. Because of this, I propose trust as a suitable goal to aim for when shaping human-AI relationships.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(4)
University of Tübingen (DE)
Baden-Württemberg Stiftung, University College Dublin, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Technische Universiteit Delft, Universidad de Buenos Aires
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
23.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.