Democratic Theorising without False Expectations

Political theorists have recently proposed to democratise the theory of democracy. Hans Asenbaum argues that one can learn from the experiences and approaches of democratic innovations. These proposals are to be welcomed and can indeed bring a new quality to democratic theory by making it more inclusive. However, there are some aspects that need to be considered. These include the irreconcilability of power discrepancies in the different stages of participation processes between the actors involved, as well as the clarification of the basic assumptions of democratic theory. This article argues for reflecting on these inequalities in the distribution of roles and making them, as well as the underlying definitions in participation processes, more transparent. It ends with some reflections to improve and strengthen the idea of democratic theorising.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Annual Review for the Sciences of the Democracies
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5117/demo2025.1.002.pau
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratic Theorising without False Expectations

Markus Pausch
The Annual Review for the Sciences of the Democracies
Social Media and Politics
article

Democratic Theorising without False Expectations

Markus Pausch
article en

Abstract

Political theorists have recently proposed to democratise the theory of democracy. Hans Asenbaum argues that one can learn from the experiences and approaches of democratic innovations. These proposals are to be welcomed and can indeed bring a new quality to democratic theory by making it more inclusive. However, there are some aspects that need to be considered. These include the irreconcilability of power discrepancies in the different stages of participation processes between the actors involved, as well as the clarification of the basic assumptions of democratic theory. This article argues for reflecting on these inequalities in the distribution of roles and making them, as well as the underlying definitions in participation processes, more transparent. It ends with some reflections to improve and strengthen the idea of democratic theorising.

The Annual Review for the Sciences of the DemocraciesVol. 1(1)
Fachhochschule Salzburg (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.