Validity of Heart Rate Variability Measured with Apple Watch Series 6 Compared to Laboratory Measures

We assessed the test validity of the Apple Watch series 6 measure of heart rate variability (HRV) by comparing it with the reference measure assessed via a Biopac 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). We recruited 78 healthy adults (aged 20-75 years). HRV was measured using an in-lab protocol while resting, talking, watching a movie, before walking, and after walking. We conducted a synchronized countdown for each condition to guarantee that the recordings would be aligned between the two devices by using event markers in the Biopac at the exact time that the Apple Watch Breathe app began and ended. We assessed test validity using the Bland-Altman method, and both precision and accuracy were estimated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. The highest level of agreement and concordance between devices occurred during rest. We observed near-perfect agreement for R-R intervals and beats per minute (BPM) measures, with mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of 1.15% during resting conditions. We observed moderate levels of agreement and concordance for N-N intervals at rest with a MAPE of 31.31% during resting conditions. The Apple Watch provides a high level of validity for measuring R-R intervals and BPM in healthy adults. Further research is needed to determine if HRV measures with the Apple Watch offer a significant opportunity for the surveillance of CVD risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25082380
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of Heart Rate Variability Measured with Apple Watch Series 6 Compared to Laboratory Measures

Job Godino, Sydney Sharp, Maíra Tristão Parra, Ryan J. Moran et al.
6 citations
Sensors
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
8.33
article

Validity of Heart Rate Variability Measured with Apple Watch Series 6 Compared to Laboratory Measures

Job Godino, Sydney Sharp, Maíra Tristão Parra, Ryan J. Moran, Andrea Z. LaCroix, David Wing, Lauren Bonneval
article en
6 citations

Abstract

We assessed the test validity of the Apple Watch series 6 measure of heart rate variability (HRV) by comparing it with the reference measure assessed via a Biopac 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). We recruited 78 healthy adults (aged 20-75 years). HRV was measured using an in-lab protocol while resting, talking, watching a movie, before walking, and after walking. We conducted a synchronized countdown for each condition to guarantee that the recordings would be aligned between the two devices by using event markers in the Biopac at the exact time that the Apple Watch Breathe app began and ended. We assessed test validity using the Bland-Altman method, and both precision and accuracy were estimated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. The highest level of agreement and concordance between devices occurred during rest. We observed near-perfect agreement for R-R intervals and beats per minute (BPM) measures, with mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of 1.15% during resting conditions. We observed moderate levels of agreement and concordance for N-N intervals at rest with a MAPE of 31.31% during resting conditions. The Apple Watch provides a high level of validity for measuring R-R intervals and BPM in healthy adults. Further research is needed to determine if HRV measures with the Apple Watch offer a significant opportunity for the surveillance of CVD risk.

SensorsVol. 25(8)
University of California San Diego (US), Family Health Centers of San Diego (US), Human Longevity (United States) (US)
University of California, San Diego
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
8.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.