Cassiodorus and his «Variae». Two Lives of a 6th Century Roman Nobleman

The article deals with a number of unsolved problems related to the study of Cassiodorus’ «Variae». It starts with the problem of dating the collection and determining the circumstances of its publication. Debating with M. Shane Bjornlie, one of the leading contemporary authorities on Cassiodorus, who insists that he published his documents in Constantinople after 540, the author argues in favour of the more traditional approach according to which the «Variae» were made public in Italy in 537-538. Another problem arises from the uncertainty about the kind of audience to which the collection was addressed. It is suggested that the key to its solution lies in the genre features of the «Variae», which can be considered an artefact of an epistolary culture inherent and comprehensible only to the Roman bureaucratic elite to which Cassiodorus himself belonged. The third problem consists in the questionable reliability of the «Variae» as a historical source. Drawing on the research of philologists and scholars of diplomatics, as well as on the data provided by archaeology and epigraphy, the author makes a case for the collection being based on authentic documents from the chancery of the Ostrogothic kings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Средние века
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7868/s0131878025010027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cassiodorus and his «Variae». Two Lives of a 6th Century Roman Nobleman

Aleksandr Kovalev
1 citations
Средние века
Classical Antiquity Studies
11.35
article

Cassiodorus and his «Variae». Two Lives of a 6th Century Roman Nobleman

Aleksandr Kovalev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article deals with a number of unsolved problems related to the study of Cassiodorus’ «Variae». It starts with the problem of dating the collection and determining the circumstances of its publication. Debating with M. Shane Bjornlie, one of the leading contemporary authorities on Cassiodorus, who insists that he published his documents in Constantinople after 540, the author argues in favour of the more traditional approach according to which the «Variae» were made public in Italy in 537-538. Another problem arises from the uncertainty about the kind of audience to which the collection was addressed. It is suggested that the key to its solution lies in the genre features of the «Variae», which can be considered an artefact of an epistolary culture inherent and comprehensible only to the Roman bureaucratic elite to which Cassiodorus himself belonged. The third problem consists in the questionable reliability of the «Variae» as a historical source. Drawing on the research of philologists and scholars of diplomatics, as well as on the data provided by archaeology and epigraphy, the author makes a case for the collection being based on authentic documents from the chancery of the Ostrogothic kings.

Средние векаVol. 86(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Classical Antiquity Studies
11.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.