“Destruction” of Tradition in Heidegger’s Works before the “Turn”

The paper is devoted to the formation and development of the concept of phe­nomenological destruction from Heidegger’s early lecture courses to Being and Time. We analyze the introduction of the term “destruction” in the lecture courses of the 1920s (The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Phenomenology of Contemplation and Expression, Introduction to the Phenomenology of Reli­gion, Augustine and Neoplatonism). At this time Heidegger understands destruc­tion in two senses. “Destruction” as “phenomenological critique” refers to a way of critically examining of particular philosophical positions by tracing their basic problematics in intellectual history. “Destruction” in the second sense is pre­sented as an integral element of the phenomenological method, which makes it possible to strip away the self-evidence of commonly used concepts and expres­sions and to rediscover what is “authentic” in traditional categories. The relation­ship between “destruction” and the Heidegger’s interpretation of history is con­sidered. The historicity of Dasein, which funds the modes of appropriation of tradition is seen as a precondition for “destruction”. It is shown that Heideg­ger’s critique is not directed at tradition, but at the ways in which tradition is ap­propriated by modern intellectual discourse. In Being and Time “destruction” provides authentic ways of accessing phenomena and involves an attempt to re­lease possibilities from the past for the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voprosy filosofii
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-12-148-158
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Destruction” of Tradition in Heidegger’s Works before the “Turn”

Svetlana Konacheva
1 citations
Voprosy filosofii
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
0.51
article

“Destruction” of Tradition in Heidegger’s Works before the “Turn”

Svetlana Konacheva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the formation and development of the concept of phe­nomenological destruction from Heidegger’s early lecture courses to Being and Time. We analyze the introduction of the term “destruction” in the lecture courses of the 1920s (The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Phenomenology of Contemplation and Expression, Introduction to the Phenomenology of Reli­gion, Augustine and Neoplatonism). At this time Heidegger understands destruc­tion in two senses. “Destruction” as “phenomenological critique” refers to a way of critically examining of particular philosophical positions by tracing their basic problematics in intellectual history. “Destruction” in the second sense is pre­sented as an integral element of the phenomenological method, which makes it possible to strip away the self-evidence of commonly used concepts and expres­sions and to rediscover what is “authentic” in traditional categories. The relation­ship between “destruction” and the Heidegger’s interpretation of history is con­sidered. The historicity of Dasein, which funds the modes of appropriation of tradition is seen as a precondition for “destruction”. It is shown that Heideg­ger’s critique is not directed at tradition, but at the ways in which tradition is ap­propriated by modern intellectual discourse. In Being and Time “destruction” provides authentic ways of accessing phenomena and involves an attempt to re­lease possibilities from the past for the future.

Voprosy filosofii(12)
Russian State University for the Humanities (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.