Implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by Clinical Dental Hygienists.

<b>Purpose</b> The World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions introduced a new framework for categorizing periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions in 2017. The purpose of this study was to investigate the current implementation practice and factors impacting implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by clinical dental hygienists.<b>Methods</b> Survey research was conducted in an online format with a non-probability sample of clinical dental hygienists recruited via social media and snowball sampling (n= 255). Components of the survey included personal, environmental, and behavioral factors along with intention to implement the classification of periodontal staging and grading system into patient care. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression.<b>Results</b> The survey completion rate was 71% (n=181). Environmental factors (β=.352, <i>p</i><.001) and personal factors (β=.469, <i>p</i><.001) were positively associated with the intention to implement the 2017 periodontal disease classification system. In contrast, behavioral factors (β=.011, <i>p</i>=.889) and highest degree earned (β=.079, <i>p</i>=.151) were not significant predictors. For the intention to attend continuing education courses on the new classification system, both behavioral factors (β=.388, <i>p</i><.001) and personal factors (β=.299, <i>p</i>=.003) were significant. However, environmental factors (β=-.048, <i>p</i>=.535), years in practice (β=-.041, <i>p</i>=.506), and familiarity (β=.066, <i>p</i>=.402) were not significant predictors.<b>Conclusion</b> Results demonstrated that both environmental and personal factors significantly influenced the intention to implement the 2017 periodontal disease classification system among clinical dental hygienists. To enhance integration, efforts should be made to focus on improving personal motivation and addressing the environmental/workplace factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by Clinical Dental Hygienists.

Kristeen R. Perry, Lori Giblin‐Scanlon, Linda D. Boyd, Jared Vineyard et al.
PubMed
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
article

Implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by Clinical Dental Hygienists.

Kristeen R. Perry, Lori Giblin‐Scanlon, Linda D. Boyd, Jared Vineyard, Qian Li
article en

Abstract

<b>Purpose</b> The World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions introduced a new framework for categorizing periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions in 2017. The purpose of this study was to investigate the current implementation practice and factors impacting implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by clinical dental hygienists.<b>Methods</b> Survey research was conducted in an online format with a non-probability sample of clinical dental hygienists recruited via social media and snowball sampling (n= 255). Components of the survey included personal, environmental, and behavioral factors along with intention to implement the classification of periodontal staging and grading system into patient care. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression.<b>Results</b> The survey completion rate was 71% (n=181). Environmental factors (β=.352, <i>p</i><.001) and personal factors (β=.469, <i>p</i><.001) were positively associated with the intention to implement the 2017 periodontal disease classification system. In contrast, behavioral factors (β=.011, <i>p</i>=.889) and highest degree earned (β=.079, <i>p</i>=.151) were not significant predictors. For the intention to attend continuing education courses on the new classification system, both behavioral factors (β=.388, <i>p</i><.001) and personal factors (β=.299, <i>p</i>=.003) were significant. However, environmental factors (β=-.048, <i>p</i>=.535), years in practice (β=-.041, <i>p</i>=.506), and familiarity (β=.066, <i>p</i>=.402) were not significant predictors.<b>Conclusion</b> Results demonstrated that both environmental and personal factors significantly influenced the intention to implement the 2017 periodontal disease classification system among clinical dental hygienists. To enhance integration, efforts should be made to focus on improving personal motivation and addressing the environmental/workplace factors.

PubMedVol. 99(2)
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.