Inhalable and Nasal Biologics: Analytical, Formulation, Development, and Regulatory Considerations

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Delivering large molecules and biologics via inhalation or intranasal routes allows these innovative therapies to directly target the respiratory tract, access the richly vascularized lymphatic tissue in the nose for vaccination, bypass gastro-intestinal and first-pass hepatic metabolism for systemically active drugs, and provide a convenient alternative to injections. These advantages are driving significant growth in research and development within this field. However, before such products can reach the market, they must undergo rigorous nonclinical studies and clinical trials and address challenges related to formulation, manufacturing, analytical testing, quality standards, and regulatory review. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> This report summarizes discussions among leading experts from industry, academia, and regulatory bodies on how to apply general Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) principles, alongside bioequivalence (BE) considerations, to the development of inhalable and nasal biologics (INBs). It also explores the balance between these requirements and the established techniques for medical aerosols. In the absence of explicit regulatory guidelines for the development of INBs, this article reviews applicable literature, including guidelines from the US FDA and EMA for biologics, on the one hand, and for small-molecule inhalation and nasal drug products, devices, and combination products, on the other. The original discussions reflected here took place at the 2023 workshop co-organized by the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM) and the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation & Science (IPAC-RS). Subsequent recent developments have also been added. The article describes regulatory expectations, the selection of delivery systems and formulation types, and analytical techniques for assessing product quality attributes of INBs. Several specific cases are presented in detail, including regulatory considerations for generic peptides, the approval package for one of the first marketed biologics for inhalation, and analytical detection strategies for viral-based products delivered to the lungs. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Looking ahead, the future of INBs includes opportunities to treat and potentially cure diseases that currently have no effective treatment or that require repeated injections. Continued collaboration among researchers, developers and regulators will be key to advancing these therapies, ultimately benefiting patients and improving health outcomes. The future of INBs looks promising!.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2024.0058
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inhalable and Nasal Biologics: Analytical, Formulation, Development, and Regulatory Considerations

Philip J. Kuehl, Heidi M. Mansour, Christopher J. Gruenloh, Svetlana Lyapustina et al.
5 citations
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
7.59
article

Inhalable and Nasal Biologics: Analytical, Formulation, Development, and Regulatory Considerations

Philip J. Kuehl, Heidi M. Mansour, Christopher J. Gruenloh, Svetlana Lyapustina, Nani Kadrichu, Nurcin Ugur, David Cipolla, Lei Mao, Bing Li, Gur Jai Pal Singh, Irene Rossi, Julie Suman, Franz-Josef K. Rehmann
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Delivering large molecules and biologics via inhalation or intranasal routes allows these innovative therapies to directly target the respiratory tract, access the richly vascularized lymphatic tissue in the nose for vaccination, bypass gastro-intestinal and first-pass hepatic metabolism for systemically active drugs, and provide a convenient alternative to injections. These advantages are driving significant growth in research and development within this field. However, before such products can reach the market, they must undergo rigorous nonclinical studies and clinical trials and address challenges related to formulation, manufacturing, analytical testing, quality standards, and regulatory review. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> This report summarizes discussions among leading experts from industry, academia, and regulatory bodies on how to apply general Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) principles, alongside bioequivalence (BE) considerations, to the development of inhalable and nasal biologics (INBs). It also explores the balance between these requirements and the established techniques for medical aerosols. In the absence of explicit regulatory guidelines for the development of INBs, this article reviews applicable literature, including guidelines from the US FDA and EMA for biologics, on the one hand, and for small-molecule inhalation and nasal drug products, devices, and combination products, on the other. The original discussions reflected here took place at the 2023 workshop co-organized by the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM) and the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation & Science (IPAC-RS). Subsequent recent developments have also been added. The article describes regulatory expectations, the selection of delivery systems and formulation types, and analytical techniques for assessing product quality attributes of INBs. Several specific cases are presented in detail, including regulatory considerations for generic peptides, the approval package for one of the first marketed biologics for inhalation, and analytical detection strategies for viral-based products delivered to the lungs. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Looking ahead, the future of INBs includes opportunities to treat and potentially cure diseases that currently have no effective treatment or that require repeated injections. Continued collaboration among researchers, developers and regulators will be key to advancing these therapies, ultimately benefiting patients and improving health outcomes. The future of INBs looks promising!.

Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug DeliveryVol. 38(5)
United States Food and Drug Administration (US), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (US), Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (US), Florida International University (US), North Carolina Institute of Medicine (US), Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (GB), Retina Associates (US), Insmed (United States) (US), Lovelace Medical Center (US), Vaccine & Gene Therapy Institute of Florida (US), Thermo Fisher Scientific (United States) (US), Bridge Pharma (United States) (US), Harro Höfliger (Germany) (DE), PDF Solutions (United States) (US), Thermo Fisher Scientific (Israel) (IL), Aalto University (FI)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
7.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.