Biological control mitigates spread of vector-borne plant pathogens

Diseases caused by vector-borne plant pathogens cause adverse impacts on yield resilience, food security, and farmer livelihoods, which are bound to aggravate under global change. Biological control is routinely discounted as a mitigation strategy for plant diseases, partially due to scarce and inconclusive empirical support. Here, using curated field survey data for 58 persistently or semi-persistently transmitted pathogens, we employ a multi-method approach to assess the role of resident (i.e., naturally occurring) biological control agents in these pathosystems. Our meta-analyses show how in planta pathogen incidence is strongly affected by vector abundance and infectivity. Meanwhile, biological control agent density negatively affects vector abundance and slows vector population build-up. Together, these relationships suggest that biological control lessens pathogen incidence by reducing vector abundance, though a paucity of data impedes direct, empirical demonstration of this effect. In particular, bipartite (mainly vector × pathogen) interactions have only been uncovered under field conditions for less than half of focal pathosystems. More so, just 5 % of studies simultaneously reported pathogen, vector, and biological control agent densities. Our study contests the long-standing dogma that arthropod-vectored pathogens cannot be mitigated through biological control, and accentuates how observational or manipulative field studies are imperative to grasp its full potential. • Natural enemies (in-)directly reduce vector abundance and disease proliferation. • Early-season natural enemy populations slow vector population build-up. • Field data on tri-partite interactions are exceptionally sparse. • Biological control complements current disease mitigation strategies. • Interdisciplinary science, next generation tools and field studies are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109683
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plant Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological control mitigates spread of vector-borne plant pathogens

Filomena C. Sta. Cruz, Evie Adriani, Yelitza C. Colmenárez, Paola Andrea Palmeros‐Suárez et al.
4 citations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Plant Virus Research Studies
7.00
article

Biological control mitigates spread of vector-borne plant pathogens

Filomena C. Sta. Cruz, Evie Adriani, Yelitza C. Colmenárez, Paola Andrea Palmeros‐Suárez, Alberto Fereres, Fathiya M. Khamis, Anne Le Ralec, James Montoya‐Lerma, Ricardo Ramírez‐Romero, Claudia Marcela Cuellar-Palacios, Maged Elkahky, Sacha Roudine, Ibtissem Ben Fekih, Sanford D. Eigenbrode, Jermaine D. Perier, Thomas Dubois, Carolina Camargo, Márcio Martinello Sanches, Carlos Vásquez, Yanhui Lu, Cécile Le Lann, Kris A. G. Wyckhuys, Freddiewebb B. Signabon, Frédéric Francis, Annabelle B. Albaytar, Marie Joy B. Beltran, Joan van Baaren, Lizette Cicero, Ihsan Nurkomar, Khalid Haddi, Karen Muñoz-Cárdenas, Lorena López, David W. Crowder, Baoqian Lyu, Pengjun Xu, Francisco J. Sanchez-Garcia, Yi Zou
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Diseases caused by vector-borne plant pathogens cause adverse impacts on yield resilience, food security, and farmer livelihoods, which are bound to aggravate under global change. Biological control is routinely discounted as a mitigation strategy for plant diseases, partially due to scarce and inconclusive empirical support. Here, using curated field survey data for 58 persistently or semi-persistently transmitted pathogens, we employ a multi-method approach to assess the role of resident (i.e., naturally occurring) biological control agents in these pathosystems. Our meta-analyses show how in planta pathogen incidence is strongly affected by vector abundance and infectivity. Meanwhile, biological control agent density negatively affects vector abundance and slows vector population build-up. Together, these relationships suggest that biological control lessens pathogen incidence by reducing vector abundance, though a paucity of data impedes direct, empirical demonstration of this effect. In particular, bipartite (mainly vector × pathogen) interactions have only been uncovered under field conditions for less than half of focal pathosystems. More so, just 5 % of studies simultaneously reported pathogen, vector, and biological control agent densities. Our study contests the long-standing dogma that arthropod-vectored pathogens cannot be mitigated through biological control, and accentuates how observational or manipulative field studies are imperative to grasp its full potential. • Natural enemies (in-)directly reduce vector abundance and disease proliferation. • Early-season natural enemy populations slow vector population build-up. • Field data on tri-partite interactions are exceptionally sparse. • Biological control complements current disease mitigation strategies. • Interdisciplinary science, next generation tools and field studies are needed.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 388
University of the Philippines Los Baños (PH), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), University of Idaho (US), University of Liège (BE), The University of Queensland (AU), International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (KE), Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (BE), Institut Agro Rennes-Angers (FR), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias (MX), Ecosystèmes, Biodiversité, Evolution (FR), Institute of Plant Protection (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Institut de Génétique, Environnement et Protection des Plantes (FR), State University of Gorontalo (ID), Centro de Investigación de la Caña de Azúcar de Colombia (CO), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN), Washington State University (US), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR), Universidad del Valle (CO)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Plant Virus Research Studies
7.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.