EVALUATION OF SOFT SPRING WHEAT LINES AND VARIETIES BY BREEDING INDICES

The studies were conducted in 2019-2023 to evaluate soft spring wheat samples for the main economically important traits and to identify valuable forms for breeding. The material for the study was 26 varieties and lines of spring soft wheat bred by Far Eastern Research Institute of Agriculture, standard – Khabarovchanka. The soil of the site is meadow-brown podzolic-gley heavy loamy with pHsalt less than 4.5 units. In May-July of 2019, the excessive waterlogging was noted (HTC=2.6), in 2021-2023 – drought conditions (HTC=1.0…1.4), in 2020 – within the average long-term values (HTC=1.7). According to grain yield (35.0…38.2 c/ha), the following varieties and breeding lines were distinguished: 21/1-01, 65/2-11, Zaryanka, 26/2-14, 19/1-14, 14/2-00, 29/8-06, 60/2-09, 11/7-14, Dalira, 48/2-14, 43/3-14, Elizaveta, 22/2-16, 47/1-14, which reliably exceeded the standard by 3.9…6.9 c/ha. The greatest influence on the productivity was exerted by the factor “year” - 67.8%, the effect of the factor “variety” reached 7.7%, their interaction - 24.5%. Promising for breeding work are the lines 94/3-09, 29/8-06, 55/5-09, 48/2-14, 19/1-14, 65/2-11, 26/2-14, 118/1-99, 47/1-14, 11/7-14, 65/1-17, 43/3-14, selected as a result of cluster analysis (Ward’s method) of standardized values of a number of breeding indices: Mexican, which characterizes resistance to lodging (MI = 0.012 ... 0.016); Canadian, allowing to estimate the specific ear yield (KI = 0.153 ... 0.171); Finno-Scandinavian, determining the grain-forming ability (FSI = 0.321 ... 0.383); linear density of the spike, reflecting the genotype-environment relationship (LPC = 3.769 ... 4.292); spike potential, which characterizes potential productivity (IPC = 0.076 ... 0.092); the ratio of size to the number of grains in the spike, demonstrating competitiveness (ICC = 0.976 ... 1.204); prospects, indicating breeding value (IP = 0.326 ... 0.390); plant productivity, which indicates resistance to unfavorable environmental factors (IPR = 7.757 ... 9.713). High-yielding lines with high selection value include 29/8-06, 55/5-09, 48/2-14, 19/1-14, 65/2-11, 26/2-14, 118/1-99, 47/1-14, 11/7-14, 65/1-17, 43/3-14.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik of Kazan state agrarin university
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12737/2073-0462-2025-1-5-11
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATION OF SOFT SPRING WHEAT LINES AND VARIETIES BY BREEDING INDICES

К. В. Зенкина, Tat'yana Aseeva
1 citations
Vestnik of Kazan state agrarin university
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
1.75
article

EVALUATION OF SOFT SPRING WHEAT LINES AND VARIETIES BY BREEDING INDICES

К. В. Зенкина, Tat'yana Aseeva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The studies were conducted in 2019-2023 to evaluate soft spring wheat samples for the main economically important traits and to identify valuable forms for breeding. The material for the study was 26 varieties and lines of spring soft wheat bred by Far Eastern Research Institute of Agriculture, standard – Khabarovchanka. The soil of the site is meadow-brown podzolic-gley heavy loamy with pHsalt less than 4.5 units. In May-July of 2019, the excessive waterlogging was noted (HTC=2.6), in 2021-2023 – drought conditions (HTC=1.0…1.4), in 2020 – within the average long-term values (HTC=1.7). According to grain yield (35.0…38.2 c/ha), the following varieties and breeding lines were distinguished: 21/1-01, 65/2-11, Zaryanka, 26/2-14, 19/1-14, 14/2-00, 29/8-06, 60/2-09, 11/7-14, Dalira, 48/2-14, 43/3-14, Elizaveta, 22/2-16, 47/1-14, which reliably exceeded the standard by 3.9…6.9 c/ha. The greatest influence on the productivity was exerted by the factor “year” - 67.8%, the effect of the factor “variety” reached 7.7%, their interaction - 24.5%. Promising for breeding work are the lines 94/3-09, 29/8-06, 55/5-09, 48/2-14, 19/1-14, 65/2-11, 26/2-14, 118/1-99, 47/1-14, 11/7-14, 65/1-17, 43/3-14, selected as a result of cluster analysis (Ward’s method) of standardized values of a number of breeding indices: Mexican, which characterizes resistance to lodging (MI = 0.012 ... 0.016); Canadian, allowing to estimate the specific ear yield (KI = 0.153 ... 0.171); Finno-Scandinavian, determining the grain-forming ability (FSI = 0.321 ... 0.383); linear density of the spike, reflecting the genotype-environment relationship (LPC = 3.769 ... 4.292); spike potential, which characterizes potential productivity (IPC = 0.076 ... 0.092); the ratio of size to the number of grains in the spike, demonstrating competitiveness (ICC = 0.976 ... 1.204); prospects, indicating breeding value (IP = 0.326 ... 0.390); plant productivity, which indicates resistance to unfavorable environmental factors (IPR = 7.757 ... 9.713). High-yielding lines with high selection value include 29/8-06, 55/5-09, 48/2-14, 19/1-14, 65/2-11, 26/2-14, 118/1-99, 47/1-14, 11/7-14, 65/1-17, 43/3-14.

Vestnik of Kazan state agrarin universityVol. 20(1)
Institute of Tectonics and Geophysics named after Y.A. Kosygin (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.