Effect of turbulent dispersion force models on hydrodynamic behaviors of slurry flows in horizontal pipes

The Eulerian–Eulerian approach, coupled with the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) technique, is a practical combination for simulating industrial slurry flows. In such simulations, the turbulent dispersion force plays a critical role in driving particles from regions of high concentration to low concentration, thereby influencing particle distribution and overall hydrodynamic behaviors. The performance of the proposed numerous turbulent dispersion force models has not been evaluated systematically in simulating sand–water slurry flows in horizontal pipes. This study investigates turbulent slurry flows in horizontal pipes under various flow conditions using the Eulerian–Eulerian approach combined with RANS. Simulations without turbulent dispersion force and with three widely used turbulent dispersion force models—Lopez de Bertodano, Simonin, and Burns—are analyzed based on predictions of streamwise velocity, secondary flow, solid concentration distribution, and liquid turbulent kinetic energy. A comparison of the simulation results with experimental data from the literature on streamwise velocity and solid concentration distribution highlights the critical importance of incorporating the turbulent dispersion force for accurate predictions. The Lopez de Bertodano model significantly underestimates the turbulent dispersion effect and, therefore, is not recommended for such flows. The Simonin and Burns models exhibit better performance; however, further refinement is required to achieve higher predictive accuracy. A computational efficiency analysis is conducted. Considering both accuracy and efficiency, the Burns model is identified as the optimal choice for the flow cases examined in this study. These findings may serve as a useful reference for slurry simulations in horizontal pipelines and assist researchers in making more informed model selections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0257795
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of turbulent dispersion force models on hydrodynamic behaviors of slurry flows in horizontal pipes

Minmin Zheng, Yanping He, Hongbo Zhu, W.K. Liu et al.
1 citations
Physics of Fluids
Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing
0.71
article

Effect of turbulent dispersion force models on hydrodynamic behaviors of slurry flows in horizontal pipes

Minmin Zheng, Yanping He, Hongbo Zhu, W.K. Liu, Haotian Chi, Rong Zhang, Runfa Zhang, Mingzhi Li, Yuwei Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Eulerian–Eulerian approach, coupled with the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) technique, is a practical combination for simulating industrial slurry flows. In such simulations, the turbulent dispersion force plays a critical role in driving particles from regions of high concentration to low concentration, thereby influencing particle distribution and overall hydrodynamic behaviors. The performance of the proposed numerous turbulent dispersion force models has not been evaluated systematically in simulating sand–water slurry flows in horizontal pipes. This study investigates turbulent slurry flows in horizontal pipes under various flow conditions using the Eulerian–Eulerian approach combined with RANS. Simulations without turbulent dispersion force and with three widely used turbulent dispersion force models—Lopez de Bertodano, Simonin, and Burns—are analyzed based on predictions of streamwise velocity, secondary flow, solid concentration distribution, and liquid turbulent kinetic energy. A comparison of the simulation results with experimental data from the literature on streamwise velocity and solid concentration distribution highlights the critical importance of incorporating the turbulent dispersion force for accurate predictions. The Lopez de Bertodano model significantly underestimates the turbulent dispersion effect and, therefore, is not recommended for such flows. The Simonin and Burns models exhibit better performance; however, further refinement is required to achieve higher predictive accuracy. A computational efficiency analysis is conducted. Considering both accuracy and efficiency, the Burns model is identified as the optimal choice for the flow cases examined in this study. These findings may serve as a useful reference for slurry simulations in horizontal pipelines and assist researchers in making more informed model selections.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(4)
Shanxi University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai Power Equipment Research Institute (CN), Shanghai Ocean University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.