Dissipative effects of baffles on the dynamics of debris flow and its impact on downstream structure

Debris flows triggered by heavy rainfall constitute a mixture of slurry and earthen aggregates. These flows travel downhill at a high speed, causing significant damage to downstream facilities. Baffles are among the common protective structures installed along debris flow paths to decelerate the flows, impeding their impact on downstream structures. Previous research mainly focused on the interactions between baffle systems and debris flows, while the flow impact responses, especially on downstream structures, were rarely examined. Based on a coupled VOF-DEM method, this study investigates the impeding effects of baffles on the dynamics of debris mixture flows and their impact on a downstream barrier. We found that baffles are more effective in decelerating the flows with low Froude numbers generally occurring on gentle slopes. However, debris flow with high Froude numbers run up and overflow through baffle arrays, reducing interactions between baffles and the flows. Increasing the number of baffle rows in a baffle system can further decelerate the flows, thereby transitioning flow run-up to stable pipe-up at the downstream barrier, reducing dynamic impact force on the barrier. Remarkably, regardless of flow inertial conditions, baffle systems with more baffle rows and shorter baffles alleviate the flow impact on the downstream barrier better than those with fewer rows and higher baffles. This finding provides a reference for baffle designers to prioritise baffle systems with more rows rather than higher baffles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Geotechnics
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107246
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dissipative effects of baffles on the dynamics of debris flow and its impact on downstream structure

Thanh‐Trung Vo, Liuxin Chen, Nhu H.T. Nguyen, Trung‐Kien Nguyen
2 citations
Computers and Geotechnics
Landslides and related hazards
4.84
article

Dissipative effects of baffles on the dynamics of debris flow and its impact on downstream structure

Thanh‐Trung Vo, Liuxin Chen, Nhu H.T. Nguyen, Trung‐Kien Nguyen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Debris flows triggered by heavy rainfall constitute a mixture of slurry and earthen aggregates. These flows travel downhill at a high speed, causing significant damage to downstream facilities. Baffles are among the common protective structures installed along debris flow paths to decelerate the flows, impeding their impact on downstream structures. Previous research mainly focused on the interactions between baffle systems and debris flows, while the flow impact responses, especially on downstream structures, were rarely examined. Based on a coupled VOF-DEM method, this study investigates the impeding effects of baffles on the dynamics of debris mixture flows and their impact on a downstream barrier. We found that baffles are more effective in decelerating the flows with low Froude numbers generally occurring on gentle slopes. However, debris flow with high Froude numbers run up and overflow through baffle arrays, reducing interactions between baffles and the flows. Increasing the number of baffle rows in a baffle system can further decelerate the flows, thereby transitioning flow run-up to stable pipe-up at the downstream barrier, reducing dynamic impact force on the barrier. Remarkably, regardless of flow inertial conditions, baffle systems with more baffle rows and shorter baffles alleviate the flow impact on the downstream barrier better than those with fewer rows and higher baffles. This finding provides a reference for baffle designers to prioritise baffle systems with more rows rather than higher baffles.

Computers and GeotechnicsVol. 184
Deakin University (AU), Danang Architecture University (VN), Monash University (AU), Hanoi University (VN)
National Foundation for Science and Technology Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Landslides and related hazards
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.