Recent discussions and proposals on challenging the 3-tier immunogenicity testing strategies from the European bioanalysis forum
The European Bioanalysis Forum, in discussions with cross-industry experts from pharmaceutical, biotech, and contract research organizations, is continuing the challenge of the traditional 3-Tier immunogenicity testing strategy, proposing a simpler, context-driven 1-Tier approach, a recent paradigm shift that emphasizes clinical relevance and the impact of anti-drug antibodies over mere incidence. In a workshop at the 17<sup>th</sup> annual Open Symposium, the meeting highlighted using signal-to-noise ratios to assess low-level ADA responses and addressed challenges such as nonspecific binding and assay reliability. Participants debated the need for continued confirmatory testing, and that it should be performed on a case-by-case basis. The shift aims to improve clinical testing strategies while reducing complexity, promoting data-driven decisions. Case studies, particularly from high-risk molecules, will guide implementation. Overall, there's strong support for the 1-Tier approach, but its success depends on robust data, industry collaboration, and regulatory approval.
Authors
- Philip Timmerman
- H. William Higgins
- Karien Bloem (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4325-8223)
- Marco Klinge
- Birgit Jaitner
- Michaela Golob
- Juan J. Novoa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3577-1182)
- Christopher M. Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2723-6019)
- Saskia van der Lee
- Kyra J. Cowan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4811-7748)
- Yvonne Katterle
- Annelies Coddens
- R. L. Nelson
- Ben Leatherdale
- Peter van Bommel
- Laura Creed
Institutions
- Bioanalytica (Switzerland) (CH)
- Research & Diagnostic Antibodies (United States) (US)
- PharmacoGenetics (China) (CN)
- Bayer (Germany) (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Bioanalysis
- Published
- 2025-04-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2487377
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.39