Proton spin in double-logarithmic approximation

Abstract Proton is a composite particle, so its spin $$S_P$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> is made from the spins of the partons which the proton consists of the discrepancy between $$S_P= 1/2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and the experimentally detected sum of the parton spins was named Proton Spin Puzzle. Solution to this problem includes formulae for the parton helicities valid in the whole range of x . There are approaches in the literature for calculating the helicities. As a theoretical basis they apply evolution equations of different types. Despite these equations are constructed for operating in widely different regions of x and account for different contributions, all of them equally well suited for solving the proton spin problem. Our explanation of this situation is that the main impact on values of the parton spin contributions should be brought not by the evolution equations themselves but by phenomenological fits for initial parton distributions. We suggest a more theoretically grounded approach to description of the parton helicities and apply it to solving the proton spin problem. It combines the total resummation of double logarithms (DL), accounting for the running $$\alpha _s$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> effects and DGLAP formulae, leading to expressions for the helicities valid at arbitrary x . As a consequence, the set of involved phenomenological parameters in our approach is minimal and its influence on the helicity behaviour is weak. We apply our approach to solve the proton spin problem in a straightforward way and make an estimate, demonstrating that the RHIC data complemented by the DL contributions from the regions of x beyond the RHIC scope are well compatible with the value $$S_P = 1/2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14067-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proton spin in double-logarithmic approximation

B. I. Ermolaev
2 citations
The European Physical Journal C
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
3.74
article

Proton spin in double-logarithmic approximation

B. I. Ermolaev
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Proton is a composite particle, so its spin $$S_P$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> is made from the spins of the partons which the proton consists of the discrepancy between $$S_P= 1/2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and the experimentally detected sum of the parton spins was named Proton Spin Puzzle. Solution to this problem includes formulae for the parton helicities valid in the whole range of x . There are approaches in the literature for calculating the helicities. As a theoretical basis they apply evolution equations of different types. Despite these equations are constructed for operating in widely different regions of x and account for different contributions, all of them equally well suited for solving the proton spin problem. Our explanation of this situation is that the main impact on values of the parton spin contributions should be brought not by the evolution equations themselves but by phenomenological fits for initial parton distributions. We suggest a more theoretically grounded approach to description of the parton helicities and apply it to solving the proton spin problem. It combines the total resummation of double logarithms (DL), accounting for the running $$\alpha _s$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> effects and DGLAP formulae, leading to expressions for the helicities valid at arbitrary x . As a consequence, the set of involved phenomenological parameters in our approach is minimal and its influence on the helicity behaviour is weak. We apply our approach to solve the proton spin problem in a straightforward way and make an estimate, demonstrating that the RHIC data complemented by the DL contributions from the regions of x beyond the RHIC scope are well compatible with the value $$S_P = 1/2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> .

The European Physical Journal CVol. 85(3)
Ioffe Institute (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
3.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.