Tectonic Setting and Evolution of Anatectic Melt Composition During Prograde Metamorphism up to UHT Metamorphism: Constraints From <i>P–T–t</i>–Melting Path From Rundvågshetta, Lützow–Holm Complex, East Antarctica

ABSTRACT The p ressure–temperature–time ( P–T–t ) evolution of a metapelitic ultrahigh‐temperature (UHT) granulite from Rundvågshetta (Lützow–Holm Complex, East Antarctica) and chemical evolution of partial melt during the prograde metamorphism up to UHT metamorphism are studied in detail. The presence of different phosphorus (P) concentration zones in garnet is used to distinguish four phases of garnet growth. The P–T conditions for the P‐poor garnet core, P‐rich mantle and two P‐poor rim growths are estimated, respectively, at ~840°C–920°C/7.7–12.5 kbar, ~920°C–1015°C/12.5–14.3 kbar, ~950°C–1000°C/7 kbar and ~800°C/5 kbar using Al 2 SiO 5 inclusions, Zr‐in‐rutile thermometry, P–T grid and pseudosection analyses. The glassy inclusions in the P‐poor core of garnet plot approximately on the Qz‐Or cotectic line for 10 kbar in the CIPW normative Qz‐Ab‐Or diagram, representing prograde to UHT melt formed through the dehydration melting of biotite + sillimanite. Furthermore, the earlier prograde P–T–t –melting information was constrained from inclusions in zircon. The inner mantle of zircon dated at 564 ± 10 Ma includes prograde inclusions of muscovite + quartz + nanogranitoids (NIs) that predate the garnet growth. The NIs in zircon remelted by piston‐cylinder experiments plot approximately on the Qz‐Or cotectic line for 5 kbar, representing the early melt formed through dehydration melting of muscovite at ~700°C/5 kbar. The P‐rich garnet mantle and the CL‐bright inner rim of zircon dated at 532 ± 5 Ma were in equilibrium at 900°C–1100°C, based on the REE distribution between them. This suggests that the peak UHT metamorphism occurred at 532 ± 5 Ma, with the prograde metamorphic period lasting ~30 Myr and overall anatectic period exceeding ~40 Myr. Negligible Pb diffusion between zircon zones possibly indicates that peak UHT was short lived, lasting less than 10 Myr. The systematic compositional change of the above‐mentioned two stages of melt inclusions is consistent with compositional evolutions in published melting experiments and thus reflects the near‐equilibrium compositional evolution of partial melts as the P – T conditions change over ~30 Myr of prograde metamorphism. Therefore, the UHT metamorphism in Rundvågshetta was probably caused by radiogenic self‐heating in the thickened crust during the continental collision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Metamorphic Geology
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jmg.12815
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tectonic Setting and Evolution of Anatectic Melt Composition During Prograde Metamorphism up to UHT Metamorphism: Constraints From P–T–t–Melting Path From Rundvågshetta, Lützow–Holm Complex, East Antarctica

Fumiko Higashino, Mineto Yokoi, Kota Suzuki, Tetsuo Kawakami et al.
9 citations
Journal of Metamorphic Geology
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
16.80
article

Tectonic Setting and Evolution of Anatectic Melt Composition During Prograde Metamorphism up to UHT Metamorphism: Constraints From P–T–t–Melting Path From Rundvågshetta, Lützow–Holm Complex, East Antarctica

Fumiko Higashino, Mineto Yokoi, Kota Suzuki, Tetsuo Kawakami, Shuhei Sakata, Tetsu Kogiso, S Kudo
article en
9 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The p ressure–temperature–time ( P–T–t ) evolution of a metapelitic ultrahigh‐temperature (UHT) granulite from Rundvågshetta (Lützow–Holm Complex, East Antarctica) and chemical evolution of partial melt during the prograde metamorphism up to UHT metamorphism are studied in detail. The presence of different phosphorus (P) concentration zones in garnet is used to distinguish four phases of garnet growth. The P–T conditions for the P‐poor garnet core, P‐rich mantle and two P‐poor rim growths are estimated, respectively, at ~840°C–920°C/7.7–12.5 kbar, ~920°C–1015°C/12.5–14.3 kbar, ~950°C–1000°C/7 kbar and ~800°C/5 kbar using Al 2 SiO 5 inclusions, Zr‐in‐rutile thermometry, P–T grid and pseudosection analyses. The glassy inclusions in the P‐poor core of garnet plot approximately on the Qz‐Or cotectic line for 10 kbar in the CIPW normative Qz‐Ab‐Or diagram, representing prograde to UHT melt formed through the dehydration melting of biotite + sillimanite. Furthermore, the earlier prograde P–T–t –melting information was constrained from inclusions in zircon. The inner mantle of zircon dated at 564 ± 10 Ma includes prograde inclusions of muscovite + quartz + nanogranitoids (NIs) that predate the garnet growth. The NIs in zircon remelted by piston‐cylinder experiments plot approximately on the Qz‐Or cotectic line for 5 kbar, representing the early melt formed through dehydration melting of muscovite at ~700°C/5 kbar. The P‐rich garnet mantle and the CL‐bright inner rim of zircon dated at 532 ± 5 Ma were in equilibrium at 900°C–1100°C, based on the REE distribution between them. This suggests that the peak UHT metamorphism occurred at 532 ± 5 Ma, with the prograde metamorphic period lasting ~30 Myr and overall anatectic period exceeding ~40 Myr. Negligible Pb diffusion between zircon zones possibly indicates that peak UHT was short lived, lasting less than 10 Myr. The systematic compositional change of the above‐mentioned two stages of melt inclusions is consistent with compositional evolutions in published melting experiments and thus reflects the near‐equilibrium compositional evolution of partial melts as the P – T conditions change over ~30 Myr of prograde metamorphism. Therefore, the UHT metamorphism in Rundvågshetta was probably caused by radiogenic self‐heating in the thickened crust during the continental collision.

Journal of Metamorphic GeologyVol. 43(5)
Kyoto University (JP), Association for the Development of Earthquake Prediction (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
16.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.