On the Epistemological Status of Comparative Standardology and Standardisation

This work stems from our desire to contribute to the epistemological consolidation of comparative standardology (CS) as an academic subdiscipline. It is based on the premise that CS falls into the applied linguistics (AL) domain, so it is right to discuss for CS what Kaplan (2002) and Grabe (2002) discussed for AL in general. Our research question is whether CS is an epistemologically firmly established academic subdiscipline. Our hypothesis is that it is, with CS being the theoretical field of standardisation, which in turn is the practice of CS. Our objective is to confirm this hypothesis. To do that, we follow the descriptive model adopted by Gelpí & Costa-Carreras (2007), which they used to describe the epistemological status of AL in general and of the disciplines related to it. We exemplify our reflections with the analysis of five papers. The expected result is a description of the relatively firmly established epistemological status of CS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Caplletra Revista Internacional de Filologia
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7203/caplletra.78.29973
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Comparative and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Epistemological Status of Comparative Standardology and Standardisation

Joan Costa Carreras
1 citations
Caplletra Revista Internacional de Filologia
Comparative and International Law Studies
article

On the Epistemological Status of Comparative Standardology and Standardisation

Joan Costa Carreras
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This work stems from our desire to contribute to the epistemological consolidation of comparative standardology (CS) as an academic subdiscipline. It is based on the premise that CS falls into the applied linguistics (AL) domain, so it is right to discuss for CS what Kaplan (2002) and Grabe (2002) discussed for AL in general. Our research question is whether CS is an epistemologically firmly established academic subdiscipline. Our hypothesis is that it is, with CS being the theoretical field of standardisation, which in turn is the practice of CS. Our objective is to confirm this hypothesis. To do that, we follow the descriptive model adopted by Gelpí & Costa-Carreras (2007), which they used to describe the epistemological status of AL in general and of the disciplines related to it. We exemplify our reflections with the analysis of five papers. The expected result is a description of the relatively firmly established epistemological status of CS.

Caplletra Revista Internacional de Filologia
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Comparative and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.