Experimental and ANN Analysis of Cold-Formed Steel Build-Up Columns with and without Intermediate Web Stiffeners under Axial Compression

To evaluate the performance of cold-formed steel (CFS) build-up columns with and without intermediate web stiffeners, an experimental study and an artificial neural network (ANN) analysis were performed on six column specimens: three with web stiffeners and three without. The performance was investigated based on their failure mechanisms, maximum strengths, stiffness parameters, and load-displacement trends in the experiments. The axial shortening and buckling behavior of cold-formed steel (CFS) build-up columns are load-dependent, whether the columns are battened and laced with or without stiffeners or are single C-sections with or without stiffeners. Based on the experimental observations, CFS build-up columns with stiffeners exhibit greater stiffness than those without stiffeners under axial compressive loading. The outcomes of the experimental investigation are discussed in detail in this article. ANN models were employed to predict the buckling failure of all six specimens. The performance of the ANN model was analyzed using statistical criteria such as R, RMSE, and MAE, with the optimal ANN architecture containing hidden layers. The results indicate that the optimal ANN model is a highly effective predictor of buckling, with R values of 0.9996, 0.99853, 0.9953, 0.99968, 0.99946, and 0.99938 in the testing phase. It is concluded that the optimal ANN model is an extremely effective machine-learning algorithm for failure prediction, providing significant results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of structural design and construction practice.
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsdccc.sceng-1751
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental and ANN Analysis of Cold-Formed Steel Build-Up Columns with and without Intermediate Web Stiffeners under Axial Compression

G. Nakkeeran, G. Premkumar, M. Vishal, Denise‐Penelope N. Kontoni et al.
2 citations
Journal of structural design and construction practice.
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
1.91
article

Experimental and ANN Analysis of Cold-Formed Steel Build-Up Columns with and without Intermediate Web Stiffeners under Axial Compression

G. Nakkeeran, G. Premkumar, M. Vishal, Denise‐Penelope N. Kontoni, Kennedy C. Onyelowe, M. Vishnupriyan, A. Selvakumar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To evaluate the performance of cold-formed steel (CFS) build-up columns with and without intermediate web stiffeners, an experimental study and an artificial neural network (ANN) analysis were performed on six column specimens: three with web stiffeners and three without. The performance was investigated based on their failure mechanisms, maximum strengths, stiffness parameters, and load-displacement trends in the experiments. The axial shortening and buckling behavior of cold-formed steel (CFS) build-up columns are load-dependent, whether the columns are battened and laced with or without stiffeners or are single C-sections with or without stiffeners. Based on the experimental observations, CFS build-up columns with stiffeners exhibit greater stiffness than those without stiffeners under axial compressive loading. The outcomes of the experimental investigation are discussed in detail in this article. ANN models were employed to predict the buckling failure of all six specimens. The performance of the ANN model was analyzed using statistical criteria such as R, RMSE, and MAE, with the optimal ANN architecture containing hidden layers. The results indicate that the optimal ANN model is a highly effective predictor of buckling, with R values of 0.9996, 0.99853, 0.9953, 0.99968, 0.99946, and 0.99938 in the testing phase. It is concluded that the optimal ANN model is an extremely effective machine-learning algorithm for failure prediction, providing significant results.

Journal of structural design and construction practice.Vol. 30(3)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), University of Peloponnese (GR), Hellenic Open University (GR), Kampala International University (UG), Kampala International University in Tanzania (TZ), SRM University (IN), B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology (IN), Michael Okpara University of Agriculture (NG)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.