Utility of hub and spoke model for estimating the burden of Group B <i>Streptococcus</i> infection and its antibiotic resistance profiling among pregnant tribal women

Objectives Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of maternal sepsis and neonatal meningitis. The objective is to determine the feasibility of using the hub-spoke model for the collection and transportation of recto-vaginal swab samples was evaluated in addition to the GBS burden among tribal females, convenient diagnostic method and antibiotic susceptibility profiling. Materials and Methods Recto-vaginal samples were collected from the 35–37 weeks pregnant women using pre-sterile HiCulture transport swab and were transferred into Lim Broth. Direct plating was carried out by inoculating swabs onto chromogenic agar. Positive colonies were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was also performed. Statistical analysis Statistical tests were performed using Microsoft excel. P &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The socio-demographic and clinical profiling of the 808 pregnant females suggested vaginal discharge (89.23%) to be the most common symptom at the time of presentation. GBS was detected in 116 (14.35%) and 52 (6.43%) by PCR and culture-based methods, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the PCR assay were estimated to be 100% and 91.53%, respectively. Obtained GBS isolates were found to be 100% sensitive to quinupristin – dalfopristin, linezolid, cefepime, and vancomycin, whereas 10%, 23%, 27%, and 23% of the isolates were found to be resistant for penicillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and levofloxacin, respectively. Conclusions Hub-spoke model for GBS screening must be emphasized in rural settings to identify pregnant women requiring prophylactic antibiotic therapy. PCR could be used as an efficient tool for identifying GBS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jlp_178_2024
Primary Topic
Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of hub and spoke model for estimating the burden of Group B Streptococcus infection and its antibiotic resistance profiling among pregnant tribal women

K Pushpalatha, Jogender Yadav, Ajay Halder, Priyal Gupta et al.
Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Neonatal and Maternal Infections
article

Utility of hub and spoke model for estimating the burden of Group B Streptococcus infection and its antibiotic resistance profiling among pregnant tribal women

K Pushpalatha, Jogender Yadav, Ajay Halder, Priyal Gupta, Shashank Purwar, Archana Mishra, Loshitarani Roy, Ashok Baranga
article en

Abstract

Objectives Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of maternal sepsis and neonatal meningitis. The objective is to determine the feasibility of using the hub-spoke model for the collection and transportation of recto-vaginal swab samples was evaluated in addition to the GBS burden among tribal females, convenient diagnostic method and antibiotic susceptibility profiling. Materials and Methods Recto-vaginal samples were collected from the 35–37 weeks pregnant women using pre-sterile HiCulture transport swab and were transferred into Lim Broth. Direct plating was carried out by inoculating swabs onto chromogenic agar. Positive colonies were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was also performed. Statistical analysis Statistical tests were performed using Microsoft excel. P &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The socio-demographic and clinical profiling of the 808 pregnant females suggested vaginal discharge (89.23%) to be the most common symptom at the time of presentation. GBS was detected in 116 (14.35%) and 52 (6.43%) by PCR and culture-based methods, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the PCR assay were estimated to be 100% and 91.53%, respectively. Obtained GBS isolates were found to be 100% sensitive to quinupristin – dalfopristin, linezolid, cefepime, and vancomycin, whereas 10%, 23%, 27%, and 23% of the isolates were found to be resistant for penicillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and levofloxacin, respectively. Conclusions Hub-spoke model for GBS screening must be emphasized in rural settings to identify pregnant women requiring prophylactic antibiotic therapy. PCR could be used as an efficient tool for identifying GBS.

Journal of Laboratory PhysiciansVol. 17
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Neonatal and Maternal Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.