Guideline on Valuation of Research Biospecimen Collections

Biobanks can consume a lot of financial resources and some biobanks have a poor record of utilization. This suggests the need for better planning by these biobanks around what new biospecimens to collect and store and more deliberate approaches to determine the value of existing biospecimen collections to make operational decisions. Existing biospecimen collections may comprise part of the biobank inventory (where decisions are needed around availability or continued storage) or external collections (where decisions are needed to consider their addition to the inventory). However, there has been limited discussion about how to value these collections. This paper proposes a guideline for the valuation of existing collections based on a two-stage process that involves consideration of features under two broad categories: "ELSI" factors and "Biospecimen and Data" factors. The first "initial-valuation" stage is based on the consideration of five key questions related to each of the main factors and will, in many instances, suffice. This approach can identify salient features of a collection that may have a dominant impact on the value. However, in other instances, a second "extended-valuation" stage may be needed to make a more in-depth assessment of the features of a collection. The overall value can then be summarized and/or assigned a score and compared with valuations of comparable collections. The latter might include another collection occupying a similar storage volume within the biobank, a collection from a similar group of donors, or a similar collection stored by another affiliated biobank. In summary, we hope that these guidelines and discussion serve to highlight key factors and an approach to valuing existing collections to improve biobanking efficiency and sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2024.0159
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guideline on Valuation of Research Biospecimen Collections

Peter H. Watson, Amanda Rush, Jennifer Anne Byrne
4 citations
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Research Data Management Practices
12.98
article

Guideline on Valuation of Research Biospecimen Collections

Peter H. Watson, Amanda Rush, Jennifer Anne Byrne
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Biobanks can consume a lot of financial resources and some biobanks have a poor record of utilization. This suggests the need for better planning by these biobanks around what new biospecimens to collect and store and more deliberate approaches to determine the value of existing biospecimen collections to make operational decisions. Existing biospecimen collections may comprise part of the biobank inventory (where decisions are needed around availability or continued storage) or external collections (where decisions are needed to consider their addition to the inventory). However, there has been limited discussion about how to value these collections. This paper proposes a guideline for the valuation of existing collections based on a two-stage process that involves consideration of features under two broad categories: "ELSI" factors and "Biospecimen and Data" factors. The first "initial-valuation" stage is based on the consideration of five key questions related to each of the main factors and will, in many instances, suffice. This approach can identify salient features of a collection that may have a dominant impact on the value. However, in other instances, a second "extended-valuation" stage may be needed to make a more in-depth assessment of the features of a collection. The overall value can then be summarized and/or assigned a score and compared with valuations of comparable collections. The latter might include another collection occupying a similar storage volume within the biobank, a collection from a similar group of donors, or a similar collection stored by another affiliated biobank. In summary, we hope that these guidelines and discussion serve to highlight key factors and an approach to valuing existing collections to improve biobanking efficiency and sustainability.

Biopreservation and BiobankingVol. 24(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), New South Wales Department of Health (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Victorian Cancer Biobank (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Research Data Management Practices
12.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.