Human health risk assessment for exposures to 1,3-butadiene in the United States with input from an independent science advisory panel

A human health risk assessment was conducted for potential cancer and noncancer effects of 1,3-butadiene (BD) using best available science, data, and methodologies. An independent panel of experts was engaged to provide input and guidance on key decisions made in the quantitative assessment. BD biomarker data played an important role in quantifying species differences, human variation, and quantifying smoking exposures. The assessment included consideration of nineteen scenarios for potential worker exposures, each of which include characterization of the impact of respirator use, and seven scenarios for aggregate exposures to BD across pathways. Monte Carlo methods were used to characterize uncertainty and variation risks and hazards from exposures to BD. The results of this assessment support three general conclusions: (1) ambient air is generally not an important source of BD exposure to the U.S. population when compared to other sources; (2) exposures to BD in the US are not expected to pose an unreasonable risk of cancer or noncancer effects; and (3) the existing OSHA PEL of 1 ppm is considered to be protective of the potential cancer risks and noncancer hazards from BD exposures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105819
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human health risk assessment for exposures to 1,3-butadiene in the United States with input from an independent science advisory panel

Sean M. Hays, Michael Dinovi, B.R. Sonawane, Gunnar Boysen et al.
4 citations
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
3.75
article

Human health risk assessment for exposures to 1,3-butadiene in the United States with input from an independent science advisory panel

Sean M. Hays, Michael Dinovi, B.R. Sonawane, Gunnar Boysen, Ruchi Roy, Christopher R. Kirman
article en
4 citations

Abstract

A human health risk assessment was conducted for potential cancer and noncancer effects of 1,3-butadiene (BD) using best available science, data, and methodologies. An independent panel of experts was engaged to provide input and guidance on key decisions made in the quantitative assessment. BD biomarker data played an important role in quantifying species differences, human variation, and quantifying smoking exposures. The assessment included consideration of nineteen scenarios for potential worker exposures, each of which include characterization of the impact of respirator use, and seven scenarios for aggregate exposures to BD across pathways. Monte Carlo methods were used to characterize uncertainty and variation risks and hazards from exposures to BD. The results of this assessment support three general conclusions: (1) ambient air is generally not an important source of BD exposure to the U.S. population when compared to other sources; (2) exposures to BD in the US are not expected to pose an unreasonable risk of cancer or noncancer effects; and (3) the existing OSHA PEL of 1 ppm is considered to be protective of the potential cancer risks and noncancer hazards from BD exposures.

Regulatory Toxicology and PharmacologyVol. 160
Impact Assessment (US), Resonon (United States) (US), Clinical Research Consultants (United States) (US), Dominion (United States) (US), MDS Associates (United States) (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
American Chemistry Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
3.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Human health risk assessment for exposures to 1,3-butadiene in the United States with input from an independent science advisory panel — Sean M. Hays, Michael Dinovi, et al. · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS